(NaturalNews) Raw, whole milk has been consumed for centuries and has long been acknowledged for its health benefits. Several research studies show superior growth and health for those children drinking raw milk compared to pasteurized milk.
(http://www.realmilk.com/brochures/real-milk-brochure/)

Raw milk has been proven to prevent scurvy, the flu, TB, and allergies. Pastured whole, raw milk contains essential fat soluble vitamins A, D and K2 along with B12, B6, C, calcium, iron, iodine and minerals which can easily be utilized by the body. When milk is pasteurized, most of these nutrients are destroyed. The remaining protein, calcium and D vitamins are denatured and poorly absorbed. In other cases, the body begins an attack on what it views as a foreign substance andallergic reactions can develop. Pasteurized milk consumption has been linked with osteoporosis, tooth decay, arthritis, heart disease and cancer.

Raw milk cures diseases

Hippocrates, Galen and other pioneering physicians all used raw milk to heal patients from disease. Dr. J. E. Crewe, in the 1920s, used a raw milk diet at the Mayo Foundation to successfully treat patients with a myriad of illnesses including tuberculosis, high blood pressure, urinary tract infections, diabetes, kidney and prostrate disease, edema, heart failure and chronic fatigue. Today, in Germany, raw, whole milk is used in hospitals to treat several diseases. Raw milk enthusiasts claim consumption of high quality whole raw milk can cure diseases including irritable bowel syndrome, arthritis and allergies. To read testimonials see:
http://rawmilkinstitute.net/about-raw-milk/testimonials/

Contaminated and diluted swill milk caused widespread deaths in the 1800s

Cheap, swill milk was produced in the 1800s in order to increase profits. These milk producing cows lived in deplorable conditions, tied up in confinement and fed distillery waste instead of their normal diet of green pasture. 50 percent of those who drank this milk died.

The decision to pasteurize milk was based on economics

In 1910, the majority of those who met to resolve the “milk” problem of unsafe swill milk were opposed to pasteurization. Most wanted raw milk to be certified to ensure high quality, safe milk which maintained its high nutrients. Decision makers were afraid of the costs to certify raw milk dairies so decided to pasteurize milk instead. Milk producers with unsafe practices began pasteurizing their milk rather than clean up their farms.

Campaign against raw milk began in imaginary town called “Crossroads”

In 1945, a false story was first reported to have taken place in a made up town called Crossroads, USA, where raw milk was blamed for an outbreak of undulant fever. This unsubstantiated report was repeated by the Progressive and Reader’s Digest. This began an effort to eliminate raw milk production.

Raw milk facts

According to a study done in Michigan, 90 percent of those who are unable to consume pasteurized milk due to lactose intolerance are able to consume raw milk with its intact enzymes. Several people die each year from allergic reactions to pasteurized milk and dairy products. E-coli, botulism, Listeria, parasite spores and other bacteria routinely found in pasteurized milk cause illness and death. Not a single death has been reliably reported from raw milk consumption. Raw milk sales continues to grow each year while pasteurized milk purchases decrease due to dairy allergies.

Raw milk resources

For sources of raw milk visit: www.realmilk.com. To help support farmers trying to supply this valuable health food contact Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund at: www.farmtoconsumer.org/. For additional information on safe raw milk visit the Raw Milk Institute at: http://rawmilkinstitute.net/

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039341_raw_milk_pasteurized_illness.html#ixzz3rtutuSNS

(NaturalNews) Ginger naturally contains a compound that is up to 10,000 times more effective than chemotherapy drugs at killing the cancer stem cells that make malignant tumors so dangerous, according to a study published in the journal PLoS.

The chemical, known as 6-shogaol, is produced when ginger roots are dried or cooked. The researchers found that 6-shogaol is active against cancer stem cells at concentrations that are harmless to healthy cells. This is dramatically different from conventional chemotherapy, which has serious side effects largely because it kills healthy as well as cancerous cells.

Cells responsible for 90 percent of cancer death?

Like other stem cells, cancer stem cells possess the ability to differentiate into various different cell types. In the case of cancer, stem cells differentiate into the various malignant cells that make up a tumor colony. Although they make up less than 1 percent of the cells in any given tumor, stem cells are impervious to nearly all known or experimental chemotherapy agents. These cells are also able to replicate indefinitely, and they are capable of splitting off from their originating colony to start new tumors elsewhere. They are key players in the process of metastasis, which is responsible for 90 percent of cancer-related deaths.

The persistence of cancer stem cells also explains why cancers can recur even after seemingly successful tumor eradication via chemotherapy, radiation or surgery.

“Cancer stem cells pose serious obstacle to cancer therapy as they can be responsible for poor prognosis and tumour relapse,” the researchers wrote. “To add into the misery, very few chemotherapeutic compounds show promise to kill these cells.”

Kills cancer cells on many fronts

The researchers found that 6-shogaol targets breast cancer stem cells along several different pathways, including reducing the expression of surface markers, altering the cell cycle to increase the rate of cell death, inhibiting tumor formation, directly inducing programmed cell death, and flat-out poisoning cancer stem cells (cytotoxicity).

The researchers then compared the cytotoxicity of 6-shogaol against human breast cancer stem cells with that of the widely used chemotherapy drug taxol. They found that while taxol did show cytotoxicity in a one-dimensional laboratory model of cancer (“monolayer”), it showed almost no effect in the three-dimensional (“spheroid”) model that is now believed to be a more accurate model of real-world cancer tumors. 6-shogaol, however, was effective in both the monolayer and spheroid models.

The researchers then increased the taxol concentration by 10,000 times, but it still showed no effectiveness in spheroid model.

“[T]axol, even though was highly active in monolayer cells, did not show activity against the spheroids even at 10,000 fold higher concentration compared to 6-shogaol,” the researchers wrote.

The promise of food-based cures

The fact that 6-shogaol naturally occurs in a widely consumed human food is promising for its safety profile, the researchers noted.

“Dietary compounds are welcome options for human diseases due to their time-tested acceptability by human bodies,” they wrote.

Another food-based chemical that has shown promise against cancer stem cells is phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC). This chemical is produced from the reaction of a compound and an enzyme that occur in cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli and cabbage. This reaction actually takes place simply when the vegetables are chewed, which means that eating cruciferous vegetables causes the human body to be exposed to PEITC.

According to a May 2015 press release by researchers from the South Dakota State University Department of Health and Nutritional Sciences, PEITC has been successful at killing cervical cancer stem cells. The concentrations used in the study are actually achievable simply from a diet rich in cruciferous vegetables, the researchers said. The vegetables highest in PEITC potential are watercress and land cress.

This research suggests that PEITC, and possibly even a diet rich in cruciferous vegetables, could assist in the prevention of or recovery from cancer.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052009_ginger_chemotherapy_cancer_treatment.html#ixzz3rtCDjeDs

By Organic Consumers Association

GMOs and glyphosate. It’s tough to talk about one without mentioning the other. The majority of GMO crops are engineered to resist Roundup, whose primary ingredient is glyphosate.

We have two action alerts we’d like you to sign this week. One deals with regulating GMO crops (we’re for tighter regulations, or better yet, moratoriums). The other deals with glyphosate (let’s ban it).

But before you scroll down and sign, it’s worth pointing out a detail sometimes overlooked in the GMO debate. Before “Roundup Ready” crops came on the scene, farmers who used herbicides (not that we’re for that) had to be careful to spray the weeds, not the crops. Otherwise, they might kill the plants along with the weeds.

Then along came seeds engineered to grow plants that won’t die, no matter how much Roundup (glyphosate) farmers spray directly on them. But could food sprayed with generous amounts of a weed killer be safe to eat?

Sure, if you can get the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use its authority to set “safe” limits for glyphosate residue on food. Which the agency did, despite warnings from its own scientists that glyphosate is carcinogenic. And when farmers needed to spray greater quantities of Roundup, because weeds evolved to tolerate it, the EPA turned around and upped the “safe” limits—allowing even more of this cancer-causing toxin to remain on food intended for human consumption.

Glyphosate is linked to more health problems than just cancer. It is likely an endocrine disruptor, though Monsanto has gone to great lengths to deceive the public and the EPA on that issue.

That brings us to our action alerts. Once every 15 years, the EPA is required to review and decide whether or not to re-register each pesticide. This year, glyphosate is up for review. Rumor has it the EPA will announce its decision sometime this week. In light of the recent determination by the World Health Organization, and mountains of new evidence linking glyphosate to human health risks, will the EPA sign off on glyphosate again?

While the EPA weighs the wisdom of allowing a cancer-causing toxin on your food, the Obama administration is pondering how to continue pandering to the biotech industry, while pretending to care about consumer concerns relating to labeling, safety testing and other regulations. Amidst all the talk about regulating and testing and labeling, we have to ask: If a GMO crop is engineered to withstand spraying with glyphosate, and glyphosate causes cancer, why are we regulating, testing and labeling? Shouldn’t we be talking outright bans on any crop grown with glyphosate?

https://www.organicconsumers.org/newsletter/organic-bytes-490-evil-twins-lost-mist-and-amplifythis/evil-twins

By Michael Snyder

If you have been watching for the next major global economic downturn, you can now stop waiting, because it has officially arrived.  Never before in history has global trade collapsed this dramatically outside of a major worldwide recession.  And this makes perfect sense – when global economic activity is increasing there is more demand for goods and services around the world, and when global economic activity is decreasing there is less demand for goods and services around the world.  So far this year, global trade is down about 8.4 percent, and over the past 30 days the Baltic Dry Index has been absolutely plummeting.  A month ago it was sitting at a reading of 809, but now it has fallen all the way to 628.  However, it is when you look at the trade numbers for specific countries that the numbers become particularly startling.

Just within the last few days, new trade numbers have come out of China.  China accounts for approximately one-fifth of all global factory exports, and for many years Chinese export growth has helped fuel the overall global economy.

But now Chinese exports are falling.  In October, Chinese exports were down 6.9 percent compared to a year ago.  That follows a decline of 3.7 percent in September.

The numbers for Chinese imports are even worse.  Chinese imports in October were down 18.8 percent compared to a year ago after falling 20.4 percent in September.  China’s growing middle class was supposed to help lead a global economic recovery, but that simply is not happening.

The following chart from Zero Hedge shows just how dramatic these latest numbers are compared to what we are accustomed to witnessing.  As you can see, the only time Chinese trade numbers have been this bad for this long was during the major global recession of 2008 and 2009…

Other numbers confirm the magnitude of the economic slowdown in China.  I have mentioned the ongoing plunge of the China Containerized Freight Index previously, but now it has just hit a brand new record low…

The weakness in China’s economy and its exports to the rest of the world are showing up in the weekly China Containerized Freight Index (CCFI): On Friday, it dropped to the worst level ever.

The index, operated by the Shanghai Shipping Exchange, tracks how much it costs, based on contractual and spot-market rates, to ship containers from China to 14 major destinations around the world. Unlike a lot of official data from China, the index is an unvarnished reflection of a relentless reality.

It has been cascading lower since February and has since dropped 31%. At 742 currently, it’s down 26% from its inception in 1998 when it was set at 1,000.

Here are some more deeply disturbing global trade numbers that come from my previous article entitled “18 Numbers That Scream That A Crippling Global Recession Has Arrived”…

–Demand for Chinese steel is down 8.9 percent compared to a year ago.

–China’s rail freight volume is down 10.1 percent compared to last year.

–In October, South Korean exports were down 15.8 percent from a year ago.

–According to the Dutch government index, a year ago global trade in primary commodities was sitting at a reading of 150 but now it has fallen all the way down to 114.  What this means is that less commodities are being traded around the world, and that is a very clear sign that global economic activity is really slowing down.

Additionally, German export orders were down about 18 percent in September, and U.S. exports are down about 10 percent for the year so far.

Clearly something very big is happening, and it is affecting the entire planet.  The CEO of the largest shipping company in the world believes that the explanation for what is taking place is fairly simple…

In fact, according to Maersk CEO, Nils Smedegaard Andersen, the reason why companies that are reliant on global trade, such as his, are flailing is simple: global growth is substantially worse than the official numbers and forecasts. To wit: “The world’s economy is growing at a slower pace than the International Monetary Fund and other large forecasters are predicting.”

Quoted by Bloomberg, Andersen says that “we believe that global growth is slowing down,” he said in a phone interview. “Trade is currently significantly weaker than it normally would be under the growth forecasts we see.“

Global financial markets can run, but they can’t hide from these horrifying trade numbers forever.

One of the big things that is contributing to this new global economic slowdown is the unwinding of the U.S. dollar carry trade.  A recent piece from Phoenix Capital Research explained the U.S. dollar carry trade pretty well…

When the Fed cut interest rates to zero in 2008, it flooded the system with US Dollars. The US Dollar is the reserve currency of the world. NO matter what country you’re in (with few exceptions) you can borrow in US Dollars.

And if you can borrow in US Dollars at 0.25%… and put that money into anything yielding more… you could make a killing.

A hedge fund in Hong Kong could borrow $100 million, pay just $250,000 in interest and plow that money into Brazilian Reals which yielded 11%… locking in a $9.75 million return.

This was the strictly financial side of things. On the economics side, Governments both sovereign and local borrowed in US Dollars around the globe to fund various infrastructure and municipal projects.

Simply put, the US Government was practically giving money away and the world took notice, borrowing Dollars at a record pace. Today, the global carry trade (meaning money borrowed in US Dollars and invested in other assets) stands at over $9 TRILLION (larger than the economy of France and Brazil combined).

But now the U.S. dollar carry trade is starting to unwind because the U.S. dollar has been doing very well lately.  As the U.S. dollar has surged against other global currencies in 2015, this has put a tremendous amount of stress on emerging markets around the world.  All of a sudden oil, other commodities and stock markets in nations such as Brazil began to crash.  Meanwhile, those that had taken out loans denominated in U.S. dollars were finding that it was taking far more of their own local currencies to service and repay those loans.  This financial crunch in emerging markets is going to take years to fully play out, and it is going to take a tremendous toll on global markets.

Of course we have seen this happen before.  A surging dollar helped cause the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s, the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s and the major global recession of 2008 and 2009.

If you thought that the financial shaking that happened in late August was bad, the truth is that it was nothing compared to what is now heading our way.

So buckle your seat belts boys and girls, because we are definitely in for a bumpy ride.

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/we-have-never-seen-global-trade-collapse-this-dramatically-outside-of-a-major-recession.html

By Makia Freeman

COP 21 or the 2015 Paris Climate Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris on November 30, 2015, will be unlike other UN climate summits or climate conferences in the past. COP 21 has a scarily grandiose objective: in their own words “to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate … for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations.” If they achieve their aim, we would be faced with the horrifying prospect that the mythology of AGW (anthropogenic global warming or manmade global warming) would become entrenched in law, thus solidifying it as fact in the minds of many. It would be a giant step towards Global Governance or a One World Government with a worldwide carbon tax, for so long now the wet dream of the New World Order manipulators.

COP 21: Trying to Make the AGW Fallacy Into Law

The objective sought at COP 21 has been a long time coming. Obama revealed how important this was to some factions of the NWO when he stated that his “definition of leadership would be leading on climate change, an international accord that potentially we’ll get in Paris,” in response to the assertion put forth by the interviewer that Putin was challenging Obama’s leadership. If worldwide climate change laws are just as important to the NWO as controlling Syria, it gives you some idea of what is at stake here. Some have also suggested that the upcoming COP 21 was the reason former Aussie PM Tony Abbott lost leadership of his party (Abbot was strongly opposed to the idea of AGW) and replaced with pro-AGW and Goldman Sachs man, Malcolm Turnbull.

Normally, the annual COP (Conference of Parties) meets to review the implementation of the “Rio Convention,” drawn up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. It includes the UNFCCC (UN Framework on Climate Change) which entered into force in 1994 and has 195 signatory parties. This time, COP 21 will be going all out with extra gusto to create a new set of planetary laws to ensure every nation must combat climate change, with the purported aim “of keeping global warming below 2°C.”

A Few Problems for COP 21: Antarctica, Greenland and the Arctic Aren’t Cooperating

Unfortunately for the global governance enthusiasts, who seek universal “consensus” among all nations and parts of the Earth, there are many factions that are not cooperating – include a couple of massive areas of ice, and a continent. Very recent data reports from multiple sources (NASA and AGU/BAS [American Geophysical Union and British Antarctic Survey]) are suggesting that not only is Antarctica not succumbing to global warming, but just the reverse – it is freezing over. Here are some quotes from the studies; this first one is from the NASA study:

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers … According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

The net gain may have slowed, but that is still a gigantic amount of ice to gain. This next one is from the joint AGU/BAS study:

Since the record is 300 years long, we can see that the amount of snow that has been accumulating in this region since the 1990s is the highest we have seen in the last 300 years … Annual snow accumulation increased in the early 20^th century, rising 30 percent between 1900 and 2010.

Meanwhile, around the North Pole, the same thing seems to be happening. Tony Heller of Steven Goddard reports that

Ice growth in Greenland continues at record levels this fall. The surface of Greenland has gained 200 billion tons of snow and ice in the last eight weeks. This has been accompanied by record cold weather approaching -60C” and also that “Arctic sea ice extent is at a ten year high for the date, after record growth.

COP 21: Capitalizing on fear mongering like has always been done?

Maybe the NWO controllers should have made anthropogenic global cooling their crusade, and fooled people into some other kind of tax based on plummeting temperatures … oh, wait a minute, they did (see image above)! I guess it’s too late to reverse course now … although with the vague term climate change anything is possible.

Leading French Meteorologist Verdier Busts AGW in His Book, Loses Job

In what is very interesting timing for France, one of their leading meteorologists, Philippe Verdier, recently published a book Climat Investigation (Climate Investigation), where he accuses climate change scientists and the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) of manipulating the data. As Verdier states in this video, “My book ‘Climate Investigation’ was published one month ago. It got me banned from the air waves,” and according to RT also said that he had put himself “in the path of COP 21, which is a bulldozer, and this is the result.”

Consensus? Far From It: Look at All the Dissenters in the Run Up to COP 21

The more you look, the more you find dissenters from all over the Earth who are speaking out against the highly politicized AGW climate change movement as COP 21 approaches. Unfortunately for the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, the UN, the IPCC and all their stooges and mouthpieces, the UN has failed to achieve consensus (one of its favorite buzzwords) on climate change, and the science is settled only in one way – showing that the world is not really warming at all, and that man’s contribution to climate change is insignificant. There are a plethora of dissenting individuals, scientists and organizations with massive research behind them showing that AGW is a political movement to usher in global governance:

– NIPCC: The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. They published the 2009 report Climate Change Reconsidered which they claim “is the most comprehensive critique of the IPCC’s positions ever published. It lists 35 contributors and reviewers from 14 countries and presents in an appendix the names of 31,478 American scientists who have signed a petition saying ‘there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate’.”;

– 1000+ dissenting scientists: as of 2010, there were more than 1000 international scientists (up from 700) who came out and publicly went on the record to state that AGW is a flawed model. The list includes many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC;

– This list of scientists who oppose the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming;

– John Casey: this former White House space program advisor believes in global cooling, and that the Earth is on the brink of a major ice age;

– Christopher Monckton: this former advisor to the UK Prime Minister has done a great job exposing the fear mongering and junk science behind the global warming movement, which is really a cover for implementing cap-and-trade (favoring big corporations) and global government. He quotes how Al Gore admitting his own sensationalism: “I believe it’s appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations of how dangerous it is”;

– Ian Plimer: this Australian geologist humorously calls the AGW movement a “load of hot air” and has shown how the data measurements for climate change have been totally rigged. He also points out how environmentalism has replaced organized religion as a matter of personal faith;

– Russia: Many have referenced Russian President Putin’s disdain for the idea of AGW, and have reported that he believes that “there is no global warming, that this is a fraud to restrain the industrial development of several countries, including Russia,” and that maybe global warming will mean Russians “spend less on fur coats.”

COP 21: Remember How It All Started …

COP 21 is the culmination of a very long-term plan, hatched by the NWO manipulators decades ago, and revealed in the documents like the Report from Iron Mountain and the Club of Rome. It is also important to note that COP 21 and AGW are the result of a Rothschild-Rockefeller attempt to create a One World Government. George Hunt was the whistleblower who was there at the start. He overheard and captured the actual voices of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and their top agents as the laid out their deceitful schemes, some of which you can hear in this video!

As William Jasper pointed out in The New American, the official draft text of the climate treaty to be agreed upon at COP 21 includes provisions for the establishment of an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” (see pg. 19 of 34) – think World Court – which, alongside a world carbon tax, is yet another stepping stone to the New World Order. Make no mistake about it; there are some serious things planned at COP 21 which will affect every human being on the planet. It remains to be seen whether the people attending the conference will vote humanity further towards a One World Government based on carbon deception.

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/cop-21-un-plan-to-make-legally-binding-climate-change-laws-worldwide.html?

by: Jonathan Benson

(NaturalNews) It’s not exactly a complete scrapping of the country’s antiquated prohibition laws governing the production and sale of raw milk, but the government of New Zealand has responded to consumer demand and made it at least somewhat easier for individuals and families to access this highly sought-after food product.

A recent announcement by New Zealand’s Ministry of Food Safety explains that beginning on March 1, 2016, raw milk will be legally available for purchase in unlimited quantities directly from the farm or via home delivery. This is a step in the right direction; earlier restrictions limited sales to only five liters of raw milk at any one time directly from the farm.

The policy change came after the New Zealand government received an outpouring of support for raw milk reform. New Zealanders wanted greater access to the product, and they made their voices heard. After much deliberation and public commentary, health officials decided to lift some of the restrictions and make it easier for folks to access this functional, living food.

“After extensive consultation and review, the government decision will allow farmers to continue to sell raw milk directly to the public from the farm and via home deliveries,” stated Food Safety Minister Jo Goodhew in a recent press release. “We have worked hard to find the right balance between managing the risks to public health while recognizing the demand from rural and urban consumers to access raw milk.”

While US health authorities tell adults they can’t drink raw milk, New Zealand says people should decide for themselves

Echoing the same scare rhetoric as U.S. policymakers, Goodhew and her colleagues have made it clear that they don’t actually support the consumption of raw milk, falsely believing it to be “high-risk.” However, unlike their American counterparts, they aren’t trying to police the eating habits of the people – at least not to the same extent as U.S. regulators.

According to the announcement, vendors who choose to sell raw milk from the farm or via home delivery will be required to keep copious records, including documenting customer information with each sale. Raw milk buyers will be asked to provide their full names, addresses, and phone numbers at the time of purchase, and each sale will be tracked for “traceability and compliance” purposes.

Farmers will also have to abide by established guidelines for production, which include special registration requirements, permits, fees and food safety guidelines. They’ll also be required to affix warning labels on each jug of raw milk indicating that the contained product could be a risk to those with compromised immune systems.

“People who make cheese for their family will be pleased there will be no limit on the quantity of raw milk they can purchase, nor is there a restriction on the amount farmers can sell overall,” added Goodhew. “Our focus has been to ensure raw milk is available for those who actively seek it, and that people are well aware of the risks associated with drinking it. I believe this policy will achieve both these goals.”

Health freedom groups are applauding the decision. Although it doesn’t eliminate prohibition entirely, it does make accessing raw milk easier for New Zealand families who would otherwise be forced to buy it on the “black market.” It’s the long-distance traveling and fly-by-night buying and selling that poses the bigger risk, they say, whereas simply allowing consumers to buy the food they want in a regulated environment helps ensure food safety.

“We’ve got members who have set up some pretty impressive little businesses, providing raw milk to local communities, and they’ve done a great job in ensuring hygiene,” stated Andrew Hoggard, the dairy chair of Federated Farmers, to Radio New Zealand News.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050432_raw_milk_New_Zealand_living_foods.html#ixzz3ri69aF8y

                                          Hamilton New Zealand TPP Protest

The TPP Was Supposed To Be Kept Secret From the Public For 5 Years! New Zealand Held True To the Principle Of Transparency And Released It!

Here is a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkqazlKJjs&feature=youtu.be

Here Is The Full TPP Document: http://www.tpp.mfat.govt.nz/text

By Nicholas West

It is no longer controversial to say that the world depicted in the fictional creation Minority Report is now our reality. Many mainstream outlets have admitted as much with their coverage of a range of technologies which center around tracking consumers’ biometrics for targeted marketing, predictive policing, predictive health algorithms, and interactive programs that make the real world seem more like a virtual reality simulation.

However, a new application of Minority Report-style tracking and analysis is beginning to trouble even those who are in the business of data mining. A new field has emerged out of research and advancements made in the area of neuroscience (the study of the brain and nervous system) – it is being dubbed Neuropolitics.

Among the digital billboards that are engaged in collecting data and tailoring marketing for many consumer products, many countries are beginning to use hidden facial recognition cameras within these billboards to capture the reactions of passersby.

The New York Times reports:

In the lobby of a Mexico City office building, people scurrying to and fro gazed briefly at the digital billboard backing a candidate for Congress in June.

They probably did not know that the sign was reading them, too.

Inside the ad, a camera captured their facial expressions and fed them through an algorithm, reading emotional reactions like happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness.

[…]According to campaign records, the campaigns of presidents and prime ministers on at least three continents have hired science consultants to scan voters’ brains, bodies and faces, all with the aim of heightening their emotional resonance with the electorate.

It is believed by proponents that this technology is far more objective than traditional methods of voter study. Some detractors say that it is junk science, while others within the industry say that it is still largely taboo to use this type of data in the political realm.

“Imagine headlines in The Daily Mail or The Sun about brainwashing, lab rats and manipulation,” read a recent article about the techniques posted by Mediatel, which focuses on the British news media.

The top three market research companies in the world — Nielsen, Kantar and Ipsos — do conduct neuromarketing research for big brand names and are upfront about it. But all three said they had a policy of not doing this type of research for political clients.

 

It seems that the country to have first used this technology was Mexico in a 2012 campaign, and it continues today. Subsequently, campaigns in Poland, Turkey, and Colombia have gone on record with admissions of currently testing and employing these techniques. The following countries are listed as having pursued Neuropolitics in “limited ways” and/or intend to use the technology for upcoming campaigns:

• Argentina
• Brazil
• Costa Rica
• El Salvador
• Russia
• Spain
• United States

As one can quickly observe, this is not a list purely made up of totalitarian bogeymen that get top billing in Western press. In fact, within the United States, it has been revealed that Hillary Clinton and John McCain are among those who have engaged Neuropolitical consultants. According to the NYT, Hillary’s chief strategist declined comment when asked about any plan for using the technology in her 2016 campaign.

As if the passive collection of this type of data would not be concerning enough, there are indications that it will go further into an area that decidedly can be called mind control. The Times reveals that the above-mentioned 2012 Mexico campaign of Enrique Peña Nieto not only used biometric data collection methods as part of their political election strategy, but does so for actual governance:

“In my government, we have utilized a variety of research tools and opinion studies to evaluate the efficacy of our governmental programs, communications and messages,” said Francisco Olvera Ruiz, the governor of the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a governing party member. “Neuroscience research,” he added, is “especially valuable because it has allowed us to discover with more precision and objectivity what people think, perceive and feel.”

 

For now, the public is generally exposed to image capture and real-time facial recognition, but with the spread of biometrics in everything from shopping to accessing the Internet, to banking – and even voting itself – the ability to collect even more personal data and use it to engineer new realities becomes a near certainty.

And, yet, the average person just can’t imagine that a cabal of power-hungry control freaks would seek to conduct surveillance upon its own citizens and orchestrate world events. Perhaps that is what remains most surprising in our new Technetronic Era.

The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. – Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages (1970).

 

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/hidden-cameras-measure-and-manipulate-political-views-neuropolitics.html?

By Bernie Suarez

With the United Nations conference on climate change just around the corner, scheduled in Paris November 30 to December 11, the climate change delusional propaganda is being ratcheted up to historic levels. We are now hearing things which under normal circumstances would be considered downright crazy talk. There is something about delusions and insanity – if you put enough lunatics in a room together, they all seem normal in comparison to each other.

Unfortunately for the global warming alarmists who are completely immune to logic and reason or any natural laws of science, the atmosphere, sunlight or any other laws of nature that interferes with their personal tyrannical global government agenda, not everyone is indulging in this heavily funded blind climate change lunacy dogma that is seemingly sweeping the globe leading up the U.N. conference in Paris.

In fact, the kind of radical talk we’re hearing from those who are pushing the carbon tax agenda is so loud and scary that up to 130 countries are threatening not to sign the climate agreement in Paris unless it gives them specific wealth they are looking for to improve their own countries. Hopefully this resistance is an early sign of things to come. Hopefully nations and people around the world will eventually see all of the global climate talk for what it is – a global taxation scheme to fund the global government forever so they can complete their imagined goals of stripping sovereign nations and individuals of their rights. This process is already underway.

Meanwhile, as we approach the upcoming U.N. climate conference in Paris the runaway train of lunacy surrounding the global warming hoax turned climate change has not only risen from the dead but is now growing horns and sharp fangs and it’s looking to attack. The global warming beast is alive but in a Frankenstein kind of way. It’s an experiment (on humanity), it’s engineered, it’s artificial and “it’s alive” again.

The Monetization of All Human Activity

Hiding under the blanket of the fast-moving U.N. climate change agenda is a slow unveiling of a blueprint to monetize, through taxation, literally every form of human activity. This is evident by a recent seven-point plan revealed by two Canadian think tanks that states exactly what is needed:

broader changes to our economy beyond carbon pricing

This is a clear indicator that taxing everyone on the planet and thus funding the global government won’t be enough. Behavior control is what they are getting at. Keep in mind these discussions are being taken very seriously by the cooperating nations. In fact many pre-Paris conference huddles discussing points of contention are taking place as the globalists are stating what they claim to be the facts behind global warming. These points of contention include mitigation, fairness and money. So we’re talking about a global money casino charade which will make billions of dollars for the global government. Their first contention of mitigation states that – “all countries agree that greenhouse-gas emission which drive global warming must be curbed.” The point of contention is – “but by how much?”

Let this shocking first contention sink in. The declaration that CO2 causes global warming is blindly accepted as gospel never to be questioned. Based on this blind dogmatic blatant lie, which has been proven wrong over and over again, we now face a catastrophic metastasizing tyrannical global government takeover of humanity, and left-brain, left-wing progressive, climate changers are blindly rolling right along with this takeover of humanity just as planned many decades ago by the Club of Rome and the Committee of 300 who laid down the groundwork for this deceptive movement.

Climate Justice Tribunal Coming Soon

As if the recent coordinated ambush of humanity isn’t enough “negotiators” at the recent U.N. Climate talks in Bonn Germany resurrected the issue of having an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” inserted into the agreement they are preparing for the Paris conference. This tribunal will allow nations to judge other nations for not cooperating with the climate agenda. Here’s a section of the text:

[An International Tribunal of Climate Justice as][A] [compliance mechanism] is hereby established to address cases of non-compliance of the commitments of developed country Parties on mitigation, adaptation, [provision of] finance, technology development and transfer [and][,] capacity-building[,] and transparency of action and support, including through the development of an indicative list of consequences, taking into account the cause, type, degree and frequency of non-compliance.

With the global community blindly moving forward with ideas for climate tribunals to vote on whether to punish sovereign nations (like the U.S.) thereby undermining national (and individual) sovereignty in the name of the global warming hoax, it’s time to get angry and start fighting back. It’s time for the scientific community to strangle this diabolical and phony climate movement that now threatens all sovereignty globally in the name of the global warming hoax which specifically blames CO2 for the warming of the planet and ignores the proven and obvious effect and role the sun plays in warming the planet. Both of these assertions (CO2 as the cause and the claim that the planet is warming uncontrollably) have been factually proven to be lies and ignore many facts about the atmosphere including the insignificant role played by CO2 and the enormous impact made by water vapor. It also ignores that over and over again NASA studies show that we have a net gain in arctic ice globally, that sea levels have risen but only slowly and that global warming has not occurred as expected over the past 14 years as reported by IPCC themselves in 2013.

What is true in all of this is the we all want (who doesn’t?) a clean planet and we should strive for a clean planet. However, that goal has nothing to do with CO2 (a necessary nutrient of the earth necessary for life!) emissions but instead with stopping the dangerous chemtrails spraying program which is releasing proven toxic metals into the atmosphere and destroying the planet and poisoning humanity. Hundreds of patents exist in the hands of the U.S. military and its contractors to prove these crimes and issue arrest warrants. So, yes, decreasing pollution is always a good thing, but it pales in comparison to the damage already done on the planet and continuing to be done at the hands of the global daily observed geoengineering which is the greatest crime ever perpetrated against humanity.

And speaking of geoengineering, as if this recent climate global taxation and tyranny agenda could not get any worse, author Oliver Morton has just written a book selling geoengineering as THE solution for climate change. The globalists failed to roll out geoengineering to the general public in 2013 thanks in part to alternative media exposing this effort, but that won’t stop them this time. Let’s keep an eye on this strategy to use global warming and climate change as an excuse to fool the general public into thinking that a “new” geoengineering spraying program will be the necessary “solution” for the good of the planet. We’ve all heard this song before.

Let’s stay calm, stay focused and not be fooled by the cascade of global government climate propaganda. Notice to the U.N. and all traitor politicians. You may have the left-brained, left wing “progressive” liberal crowd rooting for climate change and blindly accepting these global government measures to undermine national and individual sovereignty in the name of the global warming hoax, but the rest of humanity will stand for truth and freedom with regard to this issue. We will resist your lies and deception. Non-IPCC and non-government funded independent scientists all over the world must stand together against this global tyranny. Let us not allow them to take away our precious freedom and sovereignty as a nation. Let’s make sure they fail at both implementing their plans and at any attempts to punish our nation or the individual people for not complying with their phony made-up rules. We will refuse and not obey. It is up to everyone to share this information before it’s too late because you never quite appreciate something like freedom until it’s taken away.

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/global-warming-hoax-spiraling-into-radical-tyrannical-beast.html

 

By Jon Rappoport

The text of the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) has now been published here.

This Globalist treaty will put mega-corporations even further ahead in their efforts to dominate markets and populations.

“The parts of the TPP that cover food safety are especially troubling,” states the watchdog Food and Water Watch:

American consumers are pushing to block the use of artificial and potentially risky processes and ingredients, like antibiotics and GMOs, but the TPP could trump these democratic efforts to improve our food supply,’ said [Wenonah] Hauter [Food and Water Watch executive director]… Agribusiness and biotech seed companies can now more easily use trade rules to challenge countries that ban GMO imports, test for GMO contamination, do not promptly approve new GMO crops or even require GMO labeling.

The majority of Monsanto’s GMO crops are engineered to withstand huge amounts of the pesticide Roundup, and the main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, which the World Health Organization now lists as a “probable carcinogen.” As in: cancer.

That’s a recent finding. But what did Monsanto know decades ago?

From GM Watch, November 6; “Monsanto’s secret studies reveal glyphosate link to cancer”:

Monsanto has known for almost four decades that glyphosate causes cancer, according to a new paper by researchers Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff.

Samsel is the first independent researcher to examine Monsanto’s secret toxicology studies on glyphosate. He obtained the studies, which have been denied to other inquirers, via a request to his senator. With his co-researcher Dr Stephanie Seneff of MIT, he reviewed Monsanto’s data.

Samsel and Seneff concluded that ‘significant evidence of tumours was found during these investigations’.

However, they add, ‘to create doubt and obscure the statistical significance of inconvenient findings, which may have prevented product registration’, Monsanto introduced irrelevant historical control data from other experiments. This is data from the control animals in other unrelated experiments, which may have been carried out under widely differing conditions.

This practice had the effect of creating experimental noise which cancelled out the statistically significant findings of increased tumours in any one experiment.

In various cancer experiments, Samsel and Seneff found, Monsanto introduced spurious data from 3, 5, 7 and even 11 unrelated study controls to effectively eliminate results, as needed.

Getting the picture?

The new TPP greatly benefits corporations like Monsanto, and can enable the growing and shipping of all sorts of GMO crops (laden with titanic quantities of Roundup), without labeling, without inspection, and without the power of national governments to stop this ongoing crime—even though Monsanto knew, long ago, that Roundup causes tumors.

Where is the US Justice Department? Nowhere. Where is Obama, who is desperately pushing for passage of the TPP? Nowhere.

Maybe, although we don’t know it, “the science is settled.” Roundup is actually good for you. It raises IQ, extends physical endurance, elevates mood, assures safe pregnancies, promotes freedom, ensures equality and justice for all, secretly puts money in your bank account while you’re sleeping, and makes everybody love one another right now.

Operators are standing by. Call 800-THE FIX IS IN and support Monsanto for the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/the-tpp-and-gmos-whats-so-bad-about-death.html?utm_source=Activist+Post+Subscribers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=af4365fd65-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_b0c7fb76bd-af4365fd65-387740690

By Graham Vanbergen

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has its objectors – mainly the citizens of the countries involved in what can only be seen as confirmation of a corporate takeover. Governments have confirmed that democracy is no longer a principle worth pursuing.

Three million citizens have signed a petition voicing their opposition, of which 500,000 were from Britain alone.

One month ago at least 250,000 people marched in Berlin in protest against TTIP. Nearly 500 organisations have emerged with literally millions of followers who object to TTIP. The largest ever survey carried out by the EU Commission resulted in 97% of citizens being against TTIP in any form. All ignored.

As Rosa Pavanelli, Public Services International General Secretary puts it – “what has democracy come to when the community must rely on Wikileaks to find out what our governments are doing on our behalf”.

Various leaks only go to highlight the cat and mouse game being played by the nations negotiating TTIP that only raises further citizen concerns that secret meetings are only secret as they are not in the interests of people or individual nations.

A respected human-rights expert at the United Nations, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, says “there is a hierarchy of agreements, and at the top is the UN Charter: in case of conflict between the provisions of the UN Charter and any other treaty, the Charter prevails.” In other words, trade treaties that lead to a violation of human rights — or breach any other obligation set out in the UN Charter — are legally invalid. Most countries have signed onto human rights treaties, but “they have also entered into trade and investment agreements that hinder, delay or render impossible the fulfillment of their human rights treaty obligations.”

He goes one step further “Allowing private arbitrators to disregard international and national law … is tantamount to a revolution against law.” The United Nations has actually called for a suspension of TTIP talks on the basis that its tactics used by multinationals in courts outside of public jurisdiction would undermine democracy and law.

The British government stance on this is well known. Their own website states “UK national income could rise by between £4 billion and £10 billion annually, with the main gains being generated by the liberalisation of non-tariff barriers.” Double speak for reducing standards to meet the common denominator and accede to corporate power.

So far, most of the opposition to TTIP has concentrated on the controversial Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clause which will allow US corporations to sue EU governments for any decision that could harm their profits. But there is far more to TTIP than just secret corporate courts.

GlobalJustice.org.uk explains the dangers posed by the innocuously named regulatory cooperation chapter of TTIP (also commonly referred to as regulatory coherence) which could lead to a race to the bottom on key regulations in areas such as food safety and environmental protection.

Corporate lobbyists have expressed the hope that cooperation will make them so powerful that it will allow them to effectively ’co-write’ regulation with policymakers in each country, completely bypassing citizen concerns and previously enforced protection systems and laws.

GlobalJustice identifies that “to most people, regulations such as air pollution limits and food safety standards are common sense protections against dangerous threats. However, to many big businesses, these rules are just red tape or non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs) which inhibit profits and are identified as such during trade negotiations. In fact, proponents of TTIP say that 80% of the supposed benefits of the deal will come from getting rid of these rules”.

It now appears that TTIP has in fact started to change previous protections in Europe without debate. For instance, the EU Commission has now dropped previous recognition of cosmetics standards. In essence, this is a serious deregulation of cosmetic ingredients and the amended paper with the TTIP agreement no longer contains a reference to “mutual recognition” of banned and authorised substances in cosmetics.

Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)

How bad is this one may ask. The EU Commission is now stating (in an attempt to put a good spin on the story) that it would accept banned chemicals in cosmetics, which would significantly risk lowering safety standards in the EU. More than 1,300 substances are prohibited in cosmetics in the EU, while only 11 are in the US. That includes lead in your lipstick.

How does the EU get away with this? While producing lipstick that contains lead would still be illegal in the EU, US companies will still be able to export it to the EU as long as it passes US safety tests.

It gets worse as it turns out that US officials have successfully used TTIP proposals to bully the EU into disregarding plans to ban 31 dangerous pesticides with ingredients that have been shown to cause cancer and infertility.

In a similar situation, the EU had previously banned the treatment of beef with certain acids being used to conceal poor and unhygienic practices common in the US. EU commission officials pressured MEPs in stating that TTIP negotiations will be threatened if the EU ban wasn’t lifted. The pressure was great enough that MEPs then repealed the ban.

The EU has now implemented a programme called “Better Regulation”. This is designed to reduce the regulatory burden and seeks to eradicate new rules on things like safe levels of chemicals. Trade unions say that Better Regulation has already been responsible for 100,000 deaths from cancer.

America, along with its ‘partners’ is designing a new world order all of its own. The TTIP agreement is as dangerous to world harmony as the cold war because that is what the agreement will become. Its aims are clear – to create a global economic arena outside of the WTO framework. Its sees TTIP as an opportunity as part of a much wider picture as a geopolitical economic strategy against the BRICS countries of Brazil, Russia, India, ChThese negotiations will end with 53 countries accounting for two thirds of the global economy. The treaty will create a new international legal regime that will allow transnational corporations to bypass domestic courts, evade environmental protections, police the Internet on behalf of the content industry, limit the availability of affordable generic medicines, and drastically curtail each country’s legislative sovereignty. US Senator Elizabeth Warren has said “They can’t make this deal public because if the American people saw what was in it, they would be opposed to it.”

The EU has admitted that TTIP will probably cause unemployment as jobs switch to the US, where labour standards and trade union rights are lower. It has even advised EU members, including Britain to draw on European support funds to compensate for the expected unemployment.

Britain’s most powerful TTIP advocate, an anti-democractic corporate public relations lobbyist masquerading as Prime Minister David Cameron has pledged to “fire rocket boosters” under the deal without public debate on the world’s largest agreement of its type ever considered.

David Cameron went to considerable length to assure people the NHS was not part of the deal. The government spent months trying to brush the threat of TTIP under the carpet but massive public pressure has forced the them to admit the NHS is part of the deal and therefore at threat from American corporations looking to cash-in from the multi-billion dollar health service as a profit centre.

Currently, there are around 500 cases of businesses versus nations going on around the world as a direct result of TTIP like agreements and they are all taking place before ‘arbitration tribunals’ made up of corporate lawyers appointed on an ad hoc basis, which according to War on Want’s John Hilary, are “little more than kangaroo courts” with “a vested interest in ruling in favour of business.”

John McDonnell, the UK’s shadow chancellor, has described TTIP as “toxic” and resulting in a huge transfer of powers to Brussels and corporate interests. What then if Britain leaves the EU?

TTIP has nothing to do with citizens or their rights. It is about forcing governments to see the whole of society from the single viewpoint of big business. The UN expert, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas is right – this is a revolution against the law.

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/britain-ignores-un-on-ttip-as-eu-commission-sanctions-revolution-against-law.html?

By Carey Gillam

A senior scientist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture filed a whistleblower complaint on Wednesday accusing the federal agency of suppressing research findings that could call into question the use of a popular pesticide class that is a revenue powerhouse for the agrichemical industry.

Jonathan Lundgren, a senior research entomologist with the USDA’s Agriculture Research Service who has spent 11 years with the agency based in Brookings, S.D., said that retaliation and harassment from inside USDA started in April 2014, following media interviews he gave in March of that year regarding some of his research conclusions.

Lundgren’s work has included extensive examination of a class of insecticides known as neonicotinoids, or neonics, which are widely used by U.S. farmers to control pest damage to corn and other crops, helping protect production. The insecticides are sold in forms that both are sprayed on plants or coated on seeds before they are planted. They are also used on plants sold by lawns and garden retailers.

Lundgren is the first to file a formal complaint since questions arose recently about the scientific integrity of research by USDA scientists. The talk has dogged the agency for the last few years and some critics complain that scientific findings on a range of topics are suppressed if they contradict the interests of powerful corporations.

USDA declined to comment about Lundgren’s case or his specific complaints. But in a statement, the agency said it takes the integrity of its scientists’ work seriously.

“We recognize how critical that is to maintaining widespread confidence in our research among the scientific community, policy-makers, and the general public,” the statement said.

Neonicotinoids are a particularly sensitive topic because some scientists have linked them to dramatic declines in honey bee colonies, which help pollinate roughly a quarter of the food consumed annually in the United States.

The agrichemical companies that sell neonic insecticides, such as Bayer AG, BASF, Syngenta AG and others, have said other research shows that neonics are not the problem, and they have been actively lobbying lawmakers and regulators against limiting use of neonics.

Neonics are a key part of a growing global insecticide market projected at roughly $15 billion in revenues.

Lundgren and other scientists have raised questions about both the effectiveness and environmental safety of the insecticides. Research has linked “neonics” to the demise of Monarch butterflies and honey bees, in particular. Two research reports by Lundgren concluded that farmers received no yield benefit at all in using the costly neonic seed treatments.

After Lundgren spoke out about some of his findings, USDA managers blocked publication of his research, barred him from talking to the media, and disrupted operations at the laboratory he oversaw, according to the complaint filed with the federal Merit Systems Protection Board Wednesday. The filing follows an internal complaint Lundgren lodged with USDA in September 2014.

“Dr. Lundgren’s case underscores why legal protections for government scientists are sorely needed,” said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), which is providing legal services to Lundgren in his whistleblower action. “Bureaucracies under political pressure from corporate stakeholders routinely shoot the messenger, even if they are wearing a lab coat.”

https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/whistleblower-claims-censorship-research-pesticide-linked-bee-deaths

By Heather Callaghan

On October 28th, 2015 Bill Gates turned 60 years old. As one might suspect, the mainstream media has been filled with tributes and retrospectives of his life and career. These tributes of course center around Gates’ alleged revolutionary developments in technology and his “philanthropic efforts” across the globe.

Articles such as “Bill Gates at 60: His ten defining moments” and “As Bill Gates Turns 60: A Look at 10 Key Years,” such tributes are boiled down to what amounts to Bill’s 10 greatest hits. These milestones mentioned by the two articles above and the slew of other articles in the same vein focus on the creation of Microsoft, his infamous “mugshot” moment and a number of opportunistic deals clinched by Gates over the years.

However, in honor of Mr. Gates, it is important to also provide a list of his “deep tracks” that were not so heavily covered in the mainstream media. Below are just a few.

1.) Bill Gates Backs and Promotes Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Women
2.) Gates Wages War on Traditional Medicine in India
3.) Bill Gates Says Global Vaccination Program is “God’s Work”
4.) Bill Gates Promotes Malaria Vaccine Flop
5.) Bill Gates Promotes Cashless Society
6.) Bill Gates Accidentally Blows the Lid on Vaccine Scam
7.) The Bill Gates Polio Vaccine Failure
8.) Bill Gates Searching for a Super Condom
9.) Bill Gates Buys Stock in Monsanto
10.) Bill Gates Wants You to Drink Recycled Toilet-Poop Water

Read more about each one of these and also see:
Bill Gates Says Life Would Be Better With A World Government
Why Are Bill Gates And Monsanto Funding A “Doomsday” Seed Vault?
Eugenicist Bill Gates Funds Gene Tweaking Company

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/bill-gates-at-60-an-alternative-retrospective.html?

By S. D. Wells

Infectious disease-paranoid parents readily deliver their argument that anytime there is a measles, chicken pox or flu outbreak at a school, all of the non-vaccinated children are the culprits and need be banished from school until they get their inoculations. Ironically, it’s the vaccinated children who are the prime “carriers” or “shedders” of live viruses that they’ve been injected with recently, so who should we really avoid?

It is a scientific fact that any person injected with a live virus, even if it’s weakened or “inactive” due to toxic formaldehyde, can shed that virus via saliva or mucus to any person whether they are inoculated or not. This is even true when the inoculated “shedder” doesn’t come down with the disease or those particular strains of influenza themselves. When you also consider the fact that injecting mercury (thimerosal), aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde weakens the immune system by unnaturally shocking it into “fight or flight” mode, it turns out that the vaccinated children are even more vulnerable to their vaccinated counterparts who are carrying around and shedding the live viruses with which they themselves were injected.

To make matters worse, the vaccine manufacturers are immune to vaccine violence damage control because they have their own court of law with their own judges, who are paid shills of the industry. They also have a slush fund to keep the parents quiet whose children are suffering from autism spectrum disorder, brain damage, central nervous system damage and other chemical violence outcomes from the typical CDC nightmarish vaccine schedule. In other words, if every child stayed home from school for two weeks after each live virus inoculation, they would miss so much school that they could never graduate any grade, according to the CDC recommended vaccine schedule that is currently in place.

Shedding live viruses per the CDC website

The CDC counts on the public NOT reading, synthesizing and utilizing the information they publish on their website, and most Americans have no clue that the most critical information is not on television or in the newspapers. On page 5 of the 14-page PDF on the CDC website, the public is warned:

Fecal shedding of vaccine virus was evaluated in a subset of persons enrolled in the phase III trials. Vaccine virus was shed by 9% of 360 infants after dose 1, but none of 249 and 385 infants after doses 2 and 3, respectively. Shedding was observed as early as 1 day and as late as 15 days after a dose. The potential for transmission of vaccine virus was not assessed in trials. In a post-licensure evaluation in the United States, stool samples were collected from infants for 9 days following the first dose. Rotavirus antigen was detected in stool of 21% of 103 infants, as early as day 3 post vaccination and as late as day 9.

Let’s just repeat that to ourselves one time: shedding was observed as early as one day and as late as 15 days after a dose, and the potential for transmission of the vaccine virus was not assessed in trials.

In 1955, the Polio virus is FALSELY declared the “miracle vaccine of the century”

The year is 1955 and the Polio virus inoculation is declared “safe, potent and efficient” and released as the new “miracle vaccine of the century” all over the world. Immediately following the proclaimed prevention medicine for Polio, the Foundation for Infantile Paralysis ran press releases in all forms of available media that Dr. Jonas Salk invented and tested this miracle drug.

The foundation called for the manufacture of enough vaccines to inoculate more than nine million children and pregnant women. American Press and Radio declared victory for Salk and the “greatest medical discovery of the century.” Then came disastrous news: inoculated children began contracting polio. More and more cases were being reported by the day, including satellite cases where parents and siblings of inoculated children were contracting the disease, even when the inoculated child was not suffering. This was the “carrier” and “shedding” effect that science would later discover happens with measles, mumps and polio. The vaccinated children became the new carriers, and Western Medicine would blame anything else in the name of saving Big Pharma and the new reign of invasive, carcinogenic, immune-compromising and neurologically-impairing medicine.

The Disneyland outbreaks of the measles spread the same way: from shedders.

The Swine flu epidemic spread the same way: from shedders.

Seasonal influenza spreads the same way: from shedders.

Vaccinated Americans are therefore incurring weakened immunity from the toxins in today’s vaccines and are more susceptible to catching live viruses from the shedders, “the herd” with which they surround themselves, at schools and at work. “Herd immunity” is a hoax and always has been. This is a public service message.

By Miranda Devine

A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.

A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

Dr Evans says his discovery “ought to change the world”.

“But the political obstacles are massive,” he said.

His discovery explains why none of the climate models used by the IPCC reflect the evidence of recorded temperatures. The models have failed to predict the pause in global warming which has been going on for 18 years and counting.

“The model architecture was wrong,” he says. “Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.”

There is another problem with the original climate model, which has been around since 1896.

While climate scientists have been predicting since the 1990s that changes in temperature would follow changes in carbon dioxide, the records over the past half million years show that not to be the case.

So, the new improved climate model shows CO2 is not the culprit in recent global warming. But what is?

Dr Evans has a theory: solar activity. What he calls “albedo modulation”, the waxing and waning of reflected radiation from the Sun, is the likely cause of global warming.

He predicts global temperatures, which have plateaued, will begin to cool significantly, beginning between 2017 and 2021. The cooling will be about 0.3C in the 2020s. Some scientists have even forecast a mini ice age in the 2030s.

If Dr Evans is correct, then he has proven the theory on carbon dioxide wrong and blown a hole in climate alarmism. He will have explained why the doomsday predictions of climate scientists aren’t reflected in the actual temperatures.

“It took me years to figure this out, but finally there is a potential resolution between the insistence of the climate scientists that CO2 is a big problem, and the empirical evidence that it doesn’t have nearly as much effect as they say.”

Dr Evans is an expert in Fourier analysis and digital signal processing, with a PhD, and two Masters degrees from Stanford University in electrical engineering, a Bachelor of Engineering (for which he won the University medal), Bachelor of Science, and Masters in Applied Maths from the University of Sydney.

He has been summarising his results in a series of blog posts on his wife Jo Nova’s blog for climate sceptics.

He is about half way through his series, with blog post 8, “Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann Law to Earth”, published on Friday.

When it is completed his work will be published as two scientific papers. Both papers are undergoing peer review.

“It’s a new paradigm,” he says. “It has several new ideas for people to get used to.”

http://www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/miranda-devine-perth-electrical-engineers-discovery-will-change-climate-change-debate/story-fnii5thn-1227555674611

By Alex Newman

Apparently the science surrounding alleged anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) is not really so settled after all. In a barely noticed statement released last week, NASA dropped the equivalent of a nuclear bomb on the United Nations’ climate-alarmism machine, noting that ice across Antarctica has been growing at break-neck speed for decades. The surging ice growth, of course, directly contradicts the predictions of global-warming alarmists, including a 2013 report by the increasingly discredited UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change claiming, falsely as it turns out, that Antarctica was losing ice at an accelerating rate and causing rising sea levels, all supposedly owing to humanity’s emissions of the “gas of life” CO2.

NASA, an outfit that has been under fire for cranking out politicized and easily discredited warming alarmism in recent years, spoke very diplomatically in its press release. It said only that its new study on Antarctic ice “challenges” the conclusions of the UN IPCC and other outfits that have allegedly studied the issue. In fact, though, the UN warmists and their cheerleaders in the establishment press could not have been more wrong. Rather than melting ice in the southern hemisphere contributing to sea-level rise, as claimed by the UN and its pseudo-scientific climate body, ice in Antarctica is expanding fast and has been for decades — and the surging ice levels are actually causing declines in sea level.

Read entire article: http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/21875-nasa-study-showing-massive-ice-growth-debunks-un-claims

By Chris Polashenski

For millennia, Greenland’s ice sheet reflected sunlight back into space, but satellite measurements in recent years suggest the bright surface is darkening, causing solar heat to be absorbed and surface melting to accelerate. Some studies suggest this “dirty ice” or “dark snow” is caused by fallout from fossil fuel pollution and forest fires.

But a new Dartmouth-led study shows that degrading satellite sensors, not soot or dust, are responsible for the apparent decline in reflectivity of inland ice across northern Greenland. The study’s results suggest the ice sheet hasn’t lost as much reflectivity as previously thought, and that black carbon and dust concentrations haven’t increased significantly and are thus not responsible for darkening on the upper ice sheet.

The findings, which contradict anecdotal observations and earlier scientific studies, appear in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. A PDF of the study is available on request.

Observations suggest the Greenland Ice Sheet’s albedo – or its ability to reflect the sun’s energy back into the atmosphere — has declined considerably since 2001 due to black carbon and dust from increased industrialization and forest fires across the northern hemisphere. The apparent decline is greatest around the ice sheet’s edges, but it also is occurring in the high elevation interior known as the dry snow zone, where the reflectivity is effectively reset each winter by new snowfall.

Two properties dominate reflectivity in dry snow – the size of snow grains, which become larger and more absorbent as they melt, and the presence of dark impurities that absorb the sun’s energy, predominantly black carbon and mineral dust, which also cause the snow to melt faster. Snow high on the Greenland Ice Sheet typically has black carbon concentrations too low to significantly affect its reflectivity, but in 2012 large wildfires in Canada and Siberia and favorable winds may have combined to trigger record surface melting of the ice sheet that year.

In trying to explain the apparent decline in reflectivity, lead author Chris Polashenski, an adjunct assistant professor at Dartmouth’s Thayer School of Engineering and a research geophysicist at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, and his colleagues analyzed dozens of snow-pit samples from the 2012-2014 snowfalls across northern Greenland and compared them with samples from earlier years. The results showed no significant change in the quantity of black carbon deposited for the past 60 years or the quantity and mineralogical makeup of dust compared to the last 12,000 years, meaning that deposition of these light absorbing impurities is not a primary cause of reflectivity reduction or surface melting in the dry snow zone. Algae growth, which darkens ice, also was ruled out as a factor.

Instead, the findings suggest the apparent decline in the dry snow zone’s reflectivity is being caused by uncorrected degradation of sensors in NASA’s aging MODIS satellites and that the declining trend will likely disappear when new measurements are reprocessed. MODIS (or Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) is the key instrument aboard NASA’s Terra and Aqua satellites, which provide images of the Earth’s surface and cloud cover every two days. MODIS tracks features of the land, oceans and atmosphere that can help develop models that predict global changes. The Terra mission, launched in December 1999, and the Aqua mission, launched in 2002, are designed to collect data for 15 years to differentiate short- and long-term trends and regional and global phenomena.

The study’s findings don’t apply to the ice sheet’s lower elevations, where surface melting, soot and dust result in more pronounced declines in reflectivity and where warmer temperatures may promote algae growth that further erodes reflectivity.
Read more: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-10/dc-asn103015.php

By Global Research News

Revealed by the British media are the details “of the ‘deal in blood’ forged between George W. Bush and Tony Blair over the Iraq War.”

The meetings took place in Crawford, Texas a year prior to the onslaught of the US-UK led invasion of Iraq. According to the Daily Mail:

The damning memo, from secretary of state Colin Powell to president George Bush, was written on March 28, 2002, a week before Bush’s famous summit with Blair at his Crawford ranch in Texas.

The Powell document, headed ‘Secret… Memorandum for the President’, lifts the lid on how Blair and Bush secretly plotted the war behind closed doors at Crawford.

In it, Powell tells Bush that Blair ‘will be with us’ on military action. Powell assures the president: ‘The UK will follow our lead’.

The classified document also discloses that Blair agreed to act as a glorified spin doctor for the president by presenting ‘public affairs lines’ to convince a skeptical public that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction – when none existed.

In return, the president would flatter Blair’s ego and give the impression that Britain was not America’s poodle but an equal partner in the ‘special relationship’. (Mail on Sunday, October 18, 2015)

The leaked documents reveal unequivocally that Tony Blair had agreed to waging war on Iraq, one year before the invasion of March 2003:

The sensational leak shows that Blair had given an unqualified pledge to sign up to the conflict a year before the invasion started.

It flies in the face of the UK Prime Minister’s public claims at the time that he was seeking a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

He told voters: ‘We’re not proposing military action’ – in direct contrast to what the secret email now reveals.

The disclosure is certain to lead for calls for Sir John Chilcot to reopen his inquiry into the Iraq War if, as is believed, he has not seen the Powell memo.

A second explosive memo from the same cache also reveals how Bush used ‘spies’ in the Labour Party to help him to manipulate British public opinion in favor of the war.

The documents, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, are part of a batch of secret emails held on the private server of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton which U.S. courts have forced her to reveal. (Mail on Sunday, October 18, 2015)

To view the scanned documents: http://www.globalresearch.ca/smoking-gun-emails-bush-and-blair-secretly-plotted-war-on-iraq-in-march-2002/5482990?

And here we have it folks, Peter Dunne openly admitting the reason why medicinal cannabis hasn’t yet been legalised in New Zealand is because “It’s essentially a commercial decision by the pharmaceutical companies.”

“They don’t see the likely market for products as being big enough in New Zealand, so why conduct trials here?”

Let’s stop and process that for a second. Peter Dunne is saying that we are waiting on big pharmaceuticals, which make billions in profit every year selling drugs easily replaced by medicinal cannabis, to decide whether or not we should change the legislation? Anyone with half a brain understands that big pharmaceuticals aren’t the slightest bit interested in the benefits of medicinal cannabis, as by promoting it they would be cutting into their own revenue streams.

Thousands around the country already use cannabis illegally to treat illnesses such as seizures, chronic pain, migraines, menstrual cramps, nausea, insomnia and as a means to increase appetite; yet Dunne believes if it’s not pharmaceutical approved, it’s not medicine.

Furthermore, he states “we talk about medicinal cannabis. Actually, there’s no such thing. There’s medicinal cannabis products.” Essentially he’s suggesting medicinal cannabis in its natural raw form isn’t a medicine, yet as soon as pharmaceutical companies bottle it into a $1,000 a month spray called Sativex, it is considered a safe medicine. What about the thousands all around the world who are smoking or ingesting the raw medicinal cannabis, as shown in the above highly rated documentary WEED – A CNN Special Report by Dr. Sanjay Gupta?

He repeatedly states there is very little specific scientific and clinical evidence about the efficacy of medicinal cannabis, which is unfounded considering we and many others have directly emailed Dunne on numerous occasions with a list of peer reviewed studies showing the scientific evidence that cannabis not only works, but is more effective than some conventional medicines.

We don’t need to wait for pharmaceutical trials to tell us what many researchers and scientists have already discovered; cannabis is medicine.

A recent Herald DigiPoll found that 70% of Kiwis want cannabis legalised medicinally, while 13% want it legalised for all purposes – leaving an overwhelming majority of 83% in favour of changing our out-dated cannabis legislation.

Those like Peter Dunne who anti-medicinal cannabis also tend to believe that once we legalise medicinal cannabis, a large number of teenagers will start smoking it. However, a study by Colombia University researchers published in The Lancet Psychiatry found “the risk of marijuana use in states before passing medical marijuana laws did not differ significantly from the risk after medical marijuana laws were passed.” This is the sort of information our ministers should be researching if they are going to form conclusions based on fact rather than misinformation.

It’s frustrating that Peter Dunne, who holds a masters degree in political science and no background in health or medicine, is left with the decision whether or not thousands of sick Kiwis around New Zealand will have access to a medicine which is well documented to help many ailments.

This single-handedly shows how flawed our political system is; unqualified politicians in charge of portfolios they know very little about, making uninformed decisions which negatively affects the whole country.

What New Zealand needs is a health minister willing to look at the peer reviewed science relating to health, rather than relying on pharmaceutical corporations which profit from the status quo to give unbiased information. If Peter Dunne won’t change the legislation until pharmaceuticals can profit from it, then it’s high time we the people share the well established research, demand legislative change and remain vocal until we have it.

Video: WEED – A CNN Special Report by Dr. Sanjay Gupta (Full HD 1080p – 2013 Documentary)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrVXRZY1_x0

http://www.wakeupnz.net/dunne-medicinal-cannabis-essentially-commercial-decision-pharmaceutical-companies/

By Paul Craig Roberts

The Western media has only two tools. One is the outrageous lie. This overused tool no longer works, except on dumbshit Americans.

The pinpoint accuracy of the Russian cruise missiles and air attacks has the Pentagon shaking in its boots. But according to the Western presstitutes the Russian missiles fell out of the sky over Iran and never made it to their ISIS targets.

According to the presstitute reports, the Russia air attacks have only killed civilians and blew up a hospital.

The presstitutes fool only themselves and dumbshit Americans.

The other tool used by presstitutes is to discuss a problem with no reference to its causes. Yesterday I heard a long discussion on NPR, a corporate and Israeli owned propaganda organ, about the migrant problem in Europe. Yes, migrants, not refugees.

These migrants have appeared out of nowhere. They have decided to seek a better life in Europe, where capitalism, which provides jobs, freedom, democracy, and women’s rights guarantee a fulfilling life. Only the West provides a fulfilling life, because it doesn’t yet bomb itself.

The hords overrunning Europe just suddenly decided to go there. It has nothing to do with Washington’s 14 years of destruction of seven countries, enabled by the dumbship Europeans themselves, who provided cover for the war crimes under such monikers as the “coalition of the willing,” a “NATO operation,” “bringing freedom and democracy.”

From the Western presstitute media you would never know that the millions fleeing into Europe are fleeing American and European bombs that have indiscriminately slaughtered and dislocated millions of Muslim peoples.

Not even the tiny remnant of conservative magazines, the ones that the neocon nazis have not taken over or exterminated, can find the courage to connect the refugees with US policy in the Middle East.

For example, Srdja Trifkovic writing in the October issue of Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture, sees the refugees as “the third Muslim invasion of Europe.” For Trifkovic, the refugees are invaders who will bring about the collapse of the remnant of Western Christian Civilization.

Trifkovic never mentions that the Europeans brought the millions of Muslim refugees upon themselves, because their corrupt political bosses are Washington’s well-paid vassals and enabled Washington’s wars for hegemony that displaced millions of Muslims. For Trifkovic and every other conservative, only Muslims can do wrong. As Trifkovic understands it, the wrong that the West does is not defending itself against Muslims.

Trifkovic believes that Europe will soon live under Sharia law. He wonders if America will “have the wherewithal to carry the torch.”

A majority of Americans live in a fake world created by propaganda. They are disconnected from reality. I have in front of me a local North Georgia newspaper dated October that reports that “a Partiot Day Memorlal Service was held at the Dawson County Fire Headquarters on September 11 to remember the terrorist attacks that shook America 14 years ago.” Various local dignitaries called on the attendees to remember “all of those who have died not only on that day, but since that day in the fight to keep America free.”

The dignitaries did not say how murdering and dislocating millons of Muslims in seven counries keeps us free. No doubt, the quesion has never occurred to them. America runs on rote plattitudes.

The presidents of Russia and China watch with amazement the immoral stupidity that has become America’s defining characteristic. At some point the Russians and Chinese will realize that no matter how patient they are, the West is lost and cannot be redeemed.

When the West collapses from its own evil, peace will return to the world.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/10/paul-craig-roberts/pressitutes-work/