JEFF PHILLIPS-WEFFERSON, ON THE BRINK RADIO

Greetings from down under down under. I just got back to my beloved ‘little Tassie’ yesterday after a grueling 48 hour surface relocation operation and an ultra-fantastic 3 week visit to the heart of whale-dreaming country, the central coast region of NSW. I don’t know if it’s just me, but even though things with me personally have been really good, it seems like a war-zone every way I look. Low-grade schizophrenia and dementia are increasingly widespread, as individuals persist in bickering over trivial nonsense, and people on both sides of the pond drive to protest against oil drilling and ‘climate change’, eat live animals to protest against veganism, and hoist selfie sticks in inclement weather. Can you believe it? New Zealand is still recovering from her second ‘9/11’ which distracted attention from the massive anti-1080 and anti-Chinese water theft activism that had people in the streets on both islands, increased surveillance, armed the cops and hijabed the women; Australia is suffering from having some of the most widespread and fast-moving environmental destruction in the world, for example, the massive deforestation up and down the east coast which is wreaking havoc on the koala populations, and the go-ahead for the extremely controversial Adani Carmichael mega-coal mine project in southern Queensland, which will siphon off billions of litres of fresh water for free while most of the state is in the grips of a drought so severe that hundreds of thousands of cattle were dying of thirst and hunger until they were drowned by flooding recently. Leading up to a federal election happening soon, which promises to be just as much of a tumour circus as any preceding one.

https://dolphinmatrix.com/Jeff

By JD Heyes (Natural News)

If ever there was a gleaming example of how appeasement of Left-wing tyranny is never the answer, this one is.

Earlier this week, Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, who is also the founder and developer of free speech video platform Brighteon.com, posted a breaking news alert that the platform was “under extreme threat” from providers of Internet infrastructure because users of the site had posted videos of New Zealand terrorist Brenton Tarrant’s livestream murders.

Adams wrote:

We are being threatened to remove all the videos or face complete annihilation online, starting with being de-platformed from infrastructure providers, followed by legal action from none other than the nation of Australia (not even New Zealand itself, but Australia and its “Office of the eSafety Commissioner.”)

We anticipated this exact scenario many months ago, and we have been feverishly building alternative internal infrastructure to eliminate any dependencies on upstream infrastructure providers, to the extent that such a configuration is possible. However, we are still several months away from completion of that build out phase. Sadly, over the next few hours we are being forced — essentially “at gunpoint” (the irony being completely lost of the fascists who now control the ‘net) — to delete all videos containing footage of the New Zealand shooting.

Under New Zealand law, it’s very illegal to post materials that would “be injurious to the public good,” such as — obviously — videos of a crazed madman gunning down Muslim worshippers.

Never mind that in the land of Kiwi it’s perfectly fine to stream content via YouTube of Islamic State fighters executing captives by shooting them in the head or images of Civil War dead streamed on Netflix.

But again, that’s New Zealand law; America has a Constitution containing specific protections for media, speech, and expression. Why should American video hosting companies like Brighteon be forced to comply with the laws of a foreign government?

Nevertheless, Adams agreed with the demands of the global speech Nazis and he had all videos related to Tarrant’s act of terrorism removed from the platform. But that wasn’t good enough. (Related: To protect speech and democracy, President Trump must now seize the domain names of Google, Facebook, Twitter and other tech giants that abuse their power to silence human beings.)

The authoritarian Left doesn’t even accept compromise

Now, he says, a prominent New Zealand ISP is blocking all Brighteon videos, forcing users there to use VPN in order to access content on the platform.

Just like users in communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, and even Russia to a degree.

Mind you, New Zealand is a small country of about 5 million, but that’s not really the point. The government there is supposed to be a democracy — guaranteeing freedoms and liberties and the right to choose what to see and not see. And yet, the Leftists who run the government and its compliant corporations are behaving less like champions of democracy and more like disciples of Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong.

The law permitting the government to censor the Christchurch mosque shootings by Tarrant is an internal matter. A majority of New Zealanders have obviously decided the law is appropriate and worthy because they have not elected a majority to their national legislature with a mandate to repeal it.

Even blocking the banned content from being streamed inside the country no matter where it is hosted is up to New Zealand’s government regulators and content services. But blocking all videos from a platform that has agreed to your demands to take down offensive or illegal content out of — spite? — is unacceptable, or should be in a ‘free’ country.

This episode just goes to show, again, how intolerant the Left and how they aren’t interested in dialogue or compromise or ‘working things out’ with political opponents. They demand strict conformity and when they don’t get it they respond like authoritarians.

Then again, as Adams will tell you, they will respond like authoritarians even if you agree to their demands.

Read more about the censorship of the globalist Left following the New Zealand attack at Censorship.news.

By Tracey Watson (Natural News)

Warnings from concerned experts about the dangers of wireless communication devices like cellphones and tablets have been rumbling in the distance for some time now. And these warnings are becoming increasingly insistent as more evidence emerges linking this type of technology to brain, heart and other cancers.

The established health effects of the non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) dispensed by these devices also include increased electrosensitivity, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), immune system disorders, infertility, asthma and neurological disorders – and that’s with older, less damaging 2G, 3G and 4G technology.

Experts are incredibly worried about the effects of 5G, which is already being rolled out in several U.S. cities and is scheduled to be installed in countries around the world in the next few years. Consumers are excited about promises that 5G will facilitate downloads at up to 100 times greater speeds than 4G technology, all while providing more stable connections and greater capacity.

Those who know the potential dangers, however, are gravely concerned. As reported by Waking Times, a group of 250 scientists from over 40 countries recently handed in a petition to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), warning about the scientifically proven dangers of EMFs. (Related: Studies confirm that potential risks of 5G wireless radiation are too serious to ignore.)

A scientific basis for concern

The international appeal, entitled Scientists Call for Protection from Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure, warns:

Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).

The scientists explain in the appeal that multiple studies by respected scientists have confirmed that EMF affects living organisms negatively, increasing cancer risk, causing genetic damage, changing the structure and function of the reproductive system, increasing the number of damaging free radicals in the body and generally having a negative impact on the well-being of humans.

Damage also extends beyond the human race, they explain, and there is growing evidence that EMFs have harmful effects on both plant and animal life.

The scientists say that there is more than enough reason for public health agencies like the WHO to take a firm stand and establish proper international guidelines for the safe use of the technology that modern society has become so reliant on:

These findings justify our appeal to the United Nations (UN) and, all member States in the world, to encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development.  By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public health agency.

The scientists have urged the WHO and the UN to:

• Ensure that women and children are protected;
• Strengthen guidelines and regulatory standards regarding EMFs;
• Encourage manufacturers to focus on developing safer technology;
• Educate the public properly about the dangers of wireless technology;
• Encourage governments to fund further scientific studies into the dangers of EMFs;
• Enforce regulation that the media has to disclose possible conflicts of interest when citing opinions about the health and safety aspects of wireless technology; and
• Establish radiation-free areas known as white zones.

Learn more about the dangers of electromagnetic fields at EMF.news.

Parents demand removal of cell tower from elementary school after four students and three teachers develop cancer

By Lori Alton

As communication companies intensify their efforts to institute 5G wireless across the nation, parents at a California elementary school are uniting in protest against a cell phone tower on the premises – which they say has caused seven people to develop cancer. At a recent, packed school board meeting, parents threatened to pull their children from the school unless the tower is removed.

The issue revolves around radiofrequency radiation emitting from the tower, which parents say has caused cancer in four students and three teachers. The World Health Organization acknowledges that RF radiation (also known as EMF, or electromagnetic field radiation) is a possible carcinogen, and animal studies have shown a link between brain cancer and EMFs.

Highlights:

Diagnosis of tumors in children and adults push upset parents to take action

Parents throw down gauntlet before school board: Remove tower or shut down school

Cell phone towers invade residential neighborhoods

Warning: EMF radiation is being linked to genetic damage, birth defects plus many other health issues

Study links cell phone towers with higher rates of cancer

Read entire article: https://www.naturalhealth365.com/cell-tower-5g-cancer-2928.html

By Charles Hugh Smith

Adaptability and flexibility will be the core survival traits going forward.

What will separate the many nations that will crumble in the next 25 years and those few that will survive and even prosper while the status quo dissolves around them? The factors that will matter are not necessarily cultural or financial; being hard-working and wealthy won’t be enough to save nations from coming apart at the seams.

Here are the factors that will matter in the next 25 years:

1. The ability to engage and survive non-linear change, which is rapid, unpredictable and systemic, as opposed to linear change which is gradual, predictable and limited in nature.

None of the current political systems are decentralized enough and adaptable enough to survive the non-linear era we’re entering. As I explained in What If Politics Can’t Fix What’s Broken?, the politics of centralized compromise and incremental, top-down adjustments are wholly inadequate to dealing with non-linear disruptions.

2. The nations that cannot jettison their parasitic elites will fall; the few that find the political will to jettison their parasitic elites will have the wherewithal to survive and possibly even prosper as the global status quo collapses around them.

The problem, as we all know, is the parasitic elites rule the centralized hierarchies of wealth and political power, and they will cling to power even as the nation they rule crumbles around them. The hubris, complacency and greed of the ruling parasitic elites is near-infinite; the idea that the political and financial structures that they dominate will not survive simply doesn’t exist in the parasitic elites, with the exception of a few outliers who are constructing remote bugout compounds with landing strips etc.

Unfortunately for these outliers, they can’t escape satellite and drone imagery, or the loose tongues of employees, contractors, etc.

By the time the populace awakens to the precariousness of the entire status quo, it will be too late to effect meaningful change via removing the parasitic elites from power. Just as Rome was too hollowed out to survive by the end, the status quo structures will be too enfeebled to adapt quickly enough to survive.

3. Centralization of wealth, power and control has been the “solution” for hundreds or even thousands of years. We’re approaching Peak Centralization and the systemic failure of centralization as the “solution” to anything.

The only sustainable solution going forward is radical decentralization of capital, political power and control of resources. The parasitic elites rule solely because wealth and power are so highly concentrated in the hands of the few. As the financial and political systems unravel and fail, solutions that are completely outside these centralized hierarchies will arise–if the populace is free to embrace them.

4. Solutions will obsolete the existing centralized financial and political structures. Reforms will all fail, as the parasitic elites will never relinquish their control or power. The “solution” will be the total collapse of the centralized financial and political structures and the parasitic elites that control them.

5. Adaptability and flexibility will be the core survival traits going forward. The only structures adaptable and flexible enough to respond quickly and effectively enough to survive are decentralized networks — non-hierarchical, distributed rather than centralized, self-organizing rather than top-down.

Few if any of the “leading citizens” of Rome anticipated its collapse 20 years prior to the implosion. That is as true of the parasitic elites now as it was then. Collapse is truly “impossible” in the current mindset; it isn’t even conceivable that what works now will stop working. But complacent belief in the permanence of the status quo doesn’t stop friction or rust, nor will it stop collapse.

As an American, I hope the citizenry comes to understand the choice is simple and profound: either tolerate the dominance of our numerous parasitic elites and watch the nation come apart and fail or jettison the centralized structures the parasitic elites need to enforce their dominance.

https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/which-nations-will-crumble-and-which-few-will-prosper-in-the-next-25-years.html?utm

By Catherine Frompovich

“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact will have their own liberties taken away from them, but rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.  And this seems to be the final revolution.” — Aldous Huxley (1961)

What is Predictive Programming?

David Icke, who republishes my articles on his website, explains Predictive Programming as a method of changing people’s thinking, etc. using TV, movies, etc. [entertainment games?], which has been in existence, and used, for quite some time now.  Think of the space movies starting in the 1950s and ‘60s, which I loved going to see on the big screen.

Recently I came across one of David’s discussions regarding culling the population, a topic for discussion most folks don’t want to hear about.  Nevertheless, there are numerous current-day indicators of such an agenda [called eugenics] being implemented at every level of society and probably by special black ops, which possibly include weather geoengineering, disrupting the Planet’s hydrologic cycle, messing with the Jet Stream (ever hear of Polar Vortex before 2 years ago?), HAARP and causing mass destruction as if it were – and is being blamed upon – Mother Nature!

Learn more here: https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/are-you-a-human-goldfish-yet-what-role-does-technology-play-in-your-getting-there.html?

ALSO BE SURE TO WATCH

Drought, Fires, Deluge: The New World Order
22:09 minutes  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGupJXFUP6o

Culling the Population
14:20 minutes  https://youtu.be/ruj77zbqqQc?t=12

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

By Organic Consumers Association

Mere days after a jury unanimously concluded that Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller caused Edwin Hardeman’s cancer, Monsanto’s parent company, Bayer, took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal with this headline: “Let’s talk about Roundup® herbicides.”

As you might expect, Bayer’s ad wasn’t intended to discuss the truth about Roundup—it was intended to spread the same old lies.

The fact that Bayer was willing to splurge for an ad (the going rate for a WaPo full-page ad is $163,422) to try to convince the public that Roundup is safe, speaks volumes.

https://www.organicconsumers.org/blog/lets-talk-about-truth

By Organic Consumers Association

After years of battling Monsanto, of working to expose the lies about glyphosate and Roundup weedkiller, we’re seeing glimmers of hope.

But this fight is far from over. And we desperately need your help to keep it going.

Within the past eight months, juries in two key trials against Monsanto have unanimously agreed that Roundup caused the plaintiffs’ non-Hodgkin lymphoma cancers.

Both juries punished Monsanto-Bayer with huge fines.

No amount of money makes up for the pain and suffering Roundup weedkiller has caused the victims in these two trials, or the tens of thousands of other people sickened by exposure to glyphosate.

But here’s what both these trials have made clear: The overwhelming evidence points to Roundup as a cause of cancer. And what’s more, it shows that Monsanto has known all along that Roundup causes cancer—and yet the company has gone to great lengths, and spent millions of dollars, to hide that evidence from the public.

In an article published by the Guardian, U.S. Right to Know’s Carey Gillam wrote:

Even the US district judge Vince Chhabria, who oversaw the San Francisco trial that concluded Wednesday with an $80.2m damage award, had harsh words for Monsanto. Chhabria said there were “large swaths of evidence” showing that the company’s herbicides could cause cancer. He also said there was “a great deal of evidence that Monsanto has not taken a responsible, objective approach to the safety of its product . . . and does not particularly care whether its product is in fact giving people cancer, focusing instead on manipulating public opinion and undermining anyone who raises genuine and legitimate concerns about the issue.”

In 2016, 131,672,984 kilograms (290,289,239 pounds) of glyphosate was sprayed in the U.S., according to data published by the U.S. Geological Survey, obtained and analyzed by Pricenomics.

Where does all that poison end up? In soils, in drinking water, on your food—and in your body.

The widespread presence of glyphosate in everything from bread to cereal to snack bars to fruit juices to baby foods to ice cream to beer and wine has been well documented.

The latest report? Widespread glyphosate contamination in foods sold by popular chain restaurants, including many that market themselves as “healthy,” “natural” and even “organic.”

The anti-Monsanto verdicts, the testing and reporting about glyphosate in our foods, the investigative reports showing Monsanto’s extreme efforts to discredit the scientists who uncover the truth about glyphosate and Roundup have all led to greater consumer awareness.

But even as more cities and school systems announce plans to ban glyphosate, the U.S. EPA fails to act on the evidence. In fact, the EPA recently (and very quietly) moved to disapprove state efforts to impose their own restrictions on pesticide use!

We are in the middle of our own lawsuit against Monsanto, for placing misleading claims on bottles of Roundup sold to consumers.

We continue to test products for glyphosate, to report on those test results, and to go after the companies that claim their glyphosate-contaminated food is “natural.”

We are also a major funder of U.S. Right to Know, a nonprofit public interest, consumer and public health organization that has been deeply involved in exposing Monsanto’s lies and government ties.

https://www.organicconsumers.org/#close

By Dr. Helen Caldicott and Michael Welch

The eight year anniversary of the triple meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility passed mostly without comment in mainstream media circles. In spite of ongoing radiological contamination that will continue to spread and threaten human health for lifetimes to come, other stories dominate the international news cycle. The climate change conundrum, serious though it may be, seemingly crowds out all other clear and present environmental hazards.

As part of efforts to normalize this historic event and cover it up in its magnitude, the Japanese government has invested considerable financial, public relations and other resources into what they are billing the ‘Recovery Olympics‘ set to take place in a year’s time in Tokyo.

Learn more: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/03/fukushima-an-ongoing-global-radiological-catastrophe-a-huge-coverup-dr-helen-caldicott.html?

Here is an Extensive List Of Patents on Weather Control by the

United States Patent and Trademark Office

• 0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall

• 1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker

• 1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare

• 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists

• 1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft

• 1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs

• 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts

• 1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method

• 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment

• 2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987

• 2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture

• 2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator

• 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device

• 2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather

• 2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes

• 2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture

• 2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator

• 2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987

• 2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere

• 2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device

• 2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987

• 2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields

These are just a few listed. Please view the entire long list of proof here: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

The “Ghost in the Machine” –– the murderous forces in our health care system that harm patients instead of help them. This series exposes the deceptions that occur in almost all facets of health care today for no reason other than money. It also exposes the identities of the ghost’s “puppet masters” who perpetrate health misinformation and unethical drug marketing for profit, whether it’s Big Pharma or its helpers in academia, government and nongovernment agencies.