Undercover police cracked down on anyone questioning the sponsors of a corporate “Solutions 21” event in Paris. Watch this video of police arresting peaceful protesters. https://www.facebook.com/
To understand more about the Paris Climate Change talks visit this site: http://newint.org/live/2015/10/27/cop21/
By Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D
The Google Glass emits more wireless radiation than most cell phones on the market, but unlike cell phone users, Glass users may be wearing this device on their heads for more than 12 hours a day putting their health at risk.
The Google Glass emits both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth radiation. Although the Glass official web site, http://www.google.com/glass/start/, contains information warning consumers about the device’s potential interference with radio or television reception, the site provides no safety information to consumers.
As a body-worn, microwave-emitting device, Google is required by Federal law to test the Specific Absorption Rate or SAR of the Glass. This is a measure of the maximum microwave radiation absorbed by the user in 6 minutes averaged over one gram of tissue. Although Google did not post the SAR information on its web site, the Glass test reports can be found on the FCC’s web site.
The official test report indicates that the SAR for the Glass is much higher than the SARs for the iPhone 5, the Samsung Galaxy S5, or most cell phones on the market.
During the last year, Google improved the antenna on the Glass which resulted in an increase in the SAR from 1.11 to 1.42 watts/kilogram (W/kg). In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S5 has a head and body SAR of 0.57 and 0.64 W/kg, respectively. The Apple iPhone 5 has a head SAR of 1.17 and a body SAR of 1.18 W/kg.
In the U.S. no personal wireless device can have a SAR that exceeds 1.6 W/kg. The SAR standard, however, was developed several decades ago in the U.S. primarily by physicists and engineers to protect users from the acute effects of the heat generated by microwave radiation. The standards do not protect users from the non-thermal effects of cell phone radiation which have been associated with increased brain cancer risk among long-term cell phone users and other health problems in the short term including electrosensitivity, sperm damage and infertility, and reproductive health risks in children.
Just because these devices are legal does not mean they are safe
Although many health researchers, including myself, have questioned the utility of assessing only a device’s SAR, currently that is all governments measure and regulate. Governments want consumers to believe that all legally marketed wireless devices are safe, and that the SAR level does not matter as long as it meets the legal standard. Yet no study has proved that exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation is safe, and thousands of peer-reviewed, published studies have found biologic effects from such exposures. The research suggests that governments need to adopt more stringent, biologically-based, standards to protect consumers’ health.
Medical and public health professionals should call on Google to end this experiment on Glass users or at least fully inform consumers of the potential long-term health risks from wearing this device.
By Julie Fidler – Natural Society
Smartwatches collect data about users’ heart rates and exercise and stress levels; now Google wants to collect users’ blood to monitor their blood glucose.
The multinational technology company has filed a patent for a “needle-free blood draw” system that would be built into smartwatches, or even handheld devices like smartphones.
The system works like this, according to the filing: the machine sends an “abrupt surge” of gas into a barrel housing a “micro-particle” that does indeed puncture the skin and draws a miniscule amount of blood. The droplet is then sucked up into a negative pressure barrel. Theoretically, the entire process would be quicker, easier, and less painful than even the most modern glucose meter used by diabetics.
In fact, Google believes the invention might one day replace glucose meters entirely.
The patent notes that the smallest possible puncture is desirable to cause as minimal pain as possible, but very small-diameter needles aren’t preferable because they can fail to pierce the skin or may snap because they’re not strong enough. The “micro-particle” solves this problem, the filing states.
Health data, gathered in the form of wearable gadgets like heart rate monitors and activity trackers, is the future for Google, Apple, and other technology companies that are practically tripping over each other to be the one to release the next big thing.
For example, late last year, Google launched Google Fit to compete with Apple’s HealthKit. Both applications put the user’s health information, including blood pressure, temperature, and pulse from multiple devices and applications into one place.
Google is working on “smart” contact lenses that are connected to mobile devices for the purpose of helping diabetics monitor their blood sugar, as well as another type of lens to treat far-sightedness.
The company signed a deal with Novartis at the end of last year to produce the glucose-monitoring lenses for diabetics and the lenses to treat far-sightedness. Google has hinted that the technology could also be used for other purposes, and recently patented a lens with a built-in camera.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/no_author/google-access-blood/
Three former Air Force airmen spoke out against the USA’s military drone program in a damning NBC special last week. The men, who have over 20 years’ experience between them, claim the use of drones is “one of the most devastating driving forces for terrorism and destabilization around the world,” and branded them “morally outrageous.”
“People think it’s a video game. But when you fire that missile, there’s no re-start,” says former sensor operator Stephen Lewis, who was active in the Drone Program between 2005 and 2010.
It weighs on your conscience, it weighs on your soul, it weighs on your heart. Because of your actions, some child is not going to see their mother or father.
Stephen was so affected by his role in the program that he drank himself to sleep, every single night. His colleagues did the same, saying:
It was the culture there. After every shift, you’d consume a lot of alcohol…to take the edge off, so you didn’t have to think about what you did.
Michael Haas was a technician and instructor between 2005 and 2011. “These drones are very, very good at killing people,” he says. “We were very callous about any collateral damage.” Haas reveals they would often kill people simply because they were associated with a guilty person, and “we didn’t consider other people on-screen.” He also spoke frankly about the de-humanization of targets:
The less they can get you to think of the thing you’re shooting at as human, the easier it becomes for you to just follow through.
Haas reveals the use of code phrases that detract from the real cost of the Drone Program: ‘Cutting the grass before it gets too long,’ for example, is a euphemism for killing people before they become a problem – and the sickening part is, even children are not exempt from this philosophy.
Cian Westmoreland, a technician who served the program between 2006 and 2010, seems mentally and emotionally wiped out in this interview. He says the program is “politically expedient in the short-term” and like the other men, he’s eaten up with guilt about what he did.
I started having nightmares about kids and mothers dying, and I’m trying to help them, but I couldn’t. I just feel helpless, I knew it was my fault.
Cian, visibly upset, feels cheated by his country. “People who join the military…we join because of things we learned in school,” he says. “We learn about our Government, and the great things [the USA] was founded on.” Cian reveals he voted for Obama, who stood for change and human rights, but now he regrets supporting the President.
We learn about our Constitution, and we learn that Americans are always afforded due process. They haven’t honored the Constitution. They should be fighting for that more than anything.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates the USA has conducted between 544 and 568 drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia. The New America Foundation claims these strikes have killed between 2,736 and 4,169 ‘militants.’ But how many innocent people have died as a result? The Bureau of Investigative Journalism warns the figure may be as high as 1,000.
Another former drone pilot has spoken of his shame at personally killing over 1600 people. These heartbreaking testimonies come as the Pentagon plans to increase drone strikes worldwide by over 50% in the coming years. However, official research suggests the US-led coalition’s foreign policy will never stop terrorism: it simply fuels more hatred towards the West and encourages the radicalization of young Muslim men.
Dr. Judith Curry, the former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, says that climate science has become politicized, current climate models do not reflect reality, the artic ice is expanding, not contracting, and the current rate of rising sea level is the same as it has been for 10,000 years. In other words, the theory of man-made global warming is debunked by scientific facts.
Watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg_I8QypcvM&feature=youtu.be
While the police and surveillance state here seemingly gets worse all the time, Britain’s is about to take the Orwellian Nightmare cake.
The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill currently being considered there would allow British intelligence agencies to take over children’s toys and spy on people with them. From inside their own homes. The bill would also force Internet providers to assist in the “legal” hackings.
So long as the toy is Internet-connected, it could theoretically be remotely hacked.
Via the Telegraph:
“A range of devices that have been in the news recently, in relation to a hack, are children’s toys, that children can interact with,” Mr Walker said.
“These are devices that may sit in a child’s bedroom but are accessible.
“In theory, the manufacturer of those products could be the subject of a warrant to enable equipment interference with those devices.
“So the potential extent, I think, is something that needs to be carefully considered.”
Little Katy’s “Smart” Barbie… spying on you in your house for MI6.
The same would go for any “smart” appliances in a person’s home as well.
Can you imagine living in a world where law enforcement agencies can hack your home’s “smart thermostat” with voice recognition software to spy on you inside of your home?
And if bills like this — which give up liberty for security — are being considered and will likely pass in the UK, it’s only a matter of time before we see this in America, too.
In fact, let’s be honest with ourselves. All of this is probably happening already regardless, but the fact that it is being legally sanctioned and put right in people’s faces, however, is mind-boggling.
Over the past few years the dollar has staged an impressive comeback. Not because there’s anything fundamentally good about this currency’s future prospects, but because for the interim, most of the economies in world aren’t doing so hot. For a lot of investors, it is the lesser of many evils in the short term, so they view the dollar as a temporary safe haven.
However, recent signs suggest that the dollar’s rally may be coming to an end. Among them, is the fact that China and Japan, the world’s two largest holders of U.S. Treasury Debt, have just dumped a ton of dollars.
November marked a record month for China in terms of the pace of its liquidation of foreign exchange reserves. The People’s Bank of China reported on Monday, December 7 that foreign exchange reserves, which mostly consist of U.S. Treasury debt, dwindled by another $87 billion in November. This constitutes a stunning 2.5% drop in one month.
Since peaking at $3.99 trillion in June 2014, China’s central bank has sold off more than half a trillion dollars of (mostly) U.S. treasuries, accounting for 14% of its entire stockpile. At this rate China’s foreign exchange holdings will be liquidated within nine years. While there is no reason to assume the current rate will continue for that long, it does illustrate how fast the debt and currency markets are moving, hinting at possible instability ahead.
Right behind the largest U.S. Treasury holder is the second largest, Japan. Japan’s Ministry of Finance also reported a sharp drop in its own foreign exchange reserves in November, likewise also mostly U.S. Treasuries. Japan’s stockpile is now $1.233 trillion, down from $1.244 trillion last month for a drop of 1%. Since peaking, Japan’s hoard has dwindled by 6%, and the decline has so far lasted four years.
While the percentages are small, the dollar amounts appear much larger than previous treasury dumps. This suggests that there is a growing urgency to ditch the dollar. And earlier today, the value of the dollar reached its lowest level since early November. That may not sound like much, but when you see the charts, it’s obvious that the dollar’s value isn’t just falling. Its descent is rapidly accelerating.
Even the Euro managed to climb to a month high against the dollar, and all across the board, the currencies for other major economies have also been nipping at the heels of the dollar.
The ICE U.S. Dollar index a measure of the dollar’s strength against a basket of six currencies mostly comprising the euro, was down 1.1% to 97.720, its lowest level since Nov. 4, according to FactSet.
Elsewhere, the dollar weakened to ¥121.3620 late Wednesday, its lowest level since Nov. 4, compared with ¥123.00 late Tuesday in New York.
The British pound rose to $1.5184 late Wednesday, compared with $1.5011 Tuesday, as investors bought pounds ahead of Thursday’s Bank of England policy meeting.
The People’s Bank of China pushed Chinese yuan traded in the onshore market to a four-year low by setting its daily reference rate for the currency at its lowest level since August 2011. The currency, also known as the renminbi, traded at as low as 6.423 to the dollar, compared with 6.419 Tuesday.
The only real exception was the South African rand, which fell in value after their government fired its finance minister. Other than that, our currency has been getting pummeled on all fronts. It’s hard to say if this is going to be the big one. The dollar has had hiccups before over the past few years, and has always managed to recover and climb. Will this be its last hurrah?
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/china-and-japan-just-dumped-billions-of-dollars.html
The flight data recorder of the Su-24 bomber shot down by Turkey will prove the Russian jet was in Syrian airspace, not Turkish, when the attack took place, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday.
Putin was presented with the airplane’s black box, which was recovered by Syrian and Russian special-forces, by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu on Tuesday.
According to a report in the Moscow Times:
Russian President Vladimir Putin invited British experts to examine the black box from the Su-24 bomber downed by Turkey last month, the Kremlin’s official website reported Wednesday.
The Russian President made the offer during a phone conversation with British Prime Minister David Cameron when he called to offer Putin his condolences after the incident, which resulted in the death of the plane’s pilot.
Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu showed the black box to Putin at a meeting on Tuesday. The president requested that it remain closed until foreign experts arrive to participate in an investigation into the downing.
Putin has said that international experts must be present when the flight data recorder is analyzed.
“As I understand, the flight data recorder will give us the opportunity to understand the Su-24’s trajectory from the moment of its take-off to the moment of the crash,” Putin said. “This means we will be able to understand where it was [at the moment of the downing] and where the treacherous strike from the Turkish Air Force was dealt.”
The Russian Su-24 was shot down on November 24, by the Turkish Air Force, with Turkey insisting that its airspace had been violated prior to shooting down the jet. Russia argues that the bomber was in Syrian airspace when the attack occurred.
Read entire article: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/putin-invites-uk-to-analyze-black-box-of-downed-jet-says-it-will-expose-turkey-for-attacking-them.html?
Propagandists working at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States (NOAA), were caught manipulating temperature records in 2015 to make it seem that the Earth’s surface and ocean temperatures have been rising for the past 15 years.
Since the agency is controlled by the Executive branch of government, it makes sense that the manipulation of temperature data would ultimately be used to promote the global warming agenda of the Obama administration. All of this plays into a much bigger deception to gain public approval for more world governance – where the elite make decisions for the people of the world, all from the United Nations headquarters.
United Nations’ plan to restrict individual liberty through Agenda 21
We now know that there is a globalist agenda to centralize government power so that the Earth’s resources can be controlled and distributed to the people of the world in a “fair” manner. Phrases like “protecting the environment” or “sustainability of Earth’s resources” are used to bring in new rules that restrict individual liberty and promote multi-national corporate interests.
Proof of this totalitarian goal is seen in the United Nation’s Agenda 21, which is slowly influencing local governments in the US and around the world. Launched by the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) in 1991, Agenda 21 is an action plan to subtly make governments comply with UN global governance – an agenda that ultimately determines things like how everyone’s food will be grown and processed, or how much water individuals can use.
Government agencies like the NOAA can be used to manipulate and broadcast fake weather and temperature data to promote global warming fraud so that everyone is forced to believe that individual freedom is the problem, and that Earth’s resources need to be managed by global governance. This fear tactic allows the governments to implement taxes and new laws that dictate what type of energy people use, how big their homes are, how much land they can own, or how many kids they can have.
If the people can be convinced that the science is settled – that climate change is the greatest threat to the world – then the government can come up with “solutions” that restrict the people’s liberty. It’s all about control.
NOAA being used to promote global warming propaganda?
As The Daily Caller reported earlier in 2015 about NOAA’s manipulation of climate data: “To increase the rate in warming, NOAA scientists put more weight on certain ocean buoy arrays, adjusted ship-based temperature readings upward, and slightly raised land-based temperatures as well. Scientists said adjusted ship-based temperature data ‘had the largest impact on trends for the 2000-2014 time period, accounting for 0.030°C of the 0.064°C trend difference.'”
They also reported that, “buoy offset correction contributed 0.014°C… to the difference, and the additional weight given to the buoys because of their greater accuracy contributed 0.012°C.”
The US Congress launched an investigation into the matter, questioning the imminent threat of climate change that the President Obama continues to call “settled science.” The Congressional panel issued subpoenas and demanded that the NOAA hand over emails and records from U.S. scientists who participated in the study. The NOAA refused, and the investigation is ongoing.
Weather satellite battery failures – accident or design?
Interestingly, an important weather satellite, the NOAA 16, had reportedly broken up on November 25th. The Joint Space Operations Center identified an unspecified amount of “associated objects” orbiting around the abruptly destroyed NOAA 16 at 3:41 A.M. Eastern time. The reports indicate there was no collision; accordingly, NOAA 16 broke apart by itself due to a faulty battery. Launched in 2000, the weather satellite was expected to last up to five years in space. NOAA continued to use the satellite until June 2014, when they retired the spacecraft because of a “critical anomaly.”
Earlier in the year, another satellite exploded – the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Flight 13 satellite. The implosion was due to a ruptured battery. Similiarly, in 1993, NOAA 13 suddenly shut down “due to a full battery discharge.”
The newly imploded NOAA 16 contained the same type of battery that these self-destructed satellites possessed. Were the batteries, designed by Lockheed Martin Space Systems, designed to fail on command? Did the engineers for Lockheed equip the satellites with a kill switch to destroy certain types of data that could be damning to world agendas?
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052266_weather_satellite_climate_data_world_agendas.html#ixzz3u3KOPkpB
By Jonathan Landsman
Why does Western medicine hate homeopathy? Since the 1800s, conventionally-trained medical doctors have been taught that homeopathy is quackery, even ‘devilish.’ Mind you, these are the same people that thought bloodletting, leeches, mercury and lead were good to “treat” disease conditions.
A sinister plan to suppress the truth. Since the 1800s, despite its popularity among the most respected people in society, the American Medical Association (AMA) has done everything it can to wipe out homeopathy. On the next NaturalNews Talk Hour, Jonathan Landsman, and Ronald Whitmont, M.D. talk about how homeopathic remedies can help to resolve infections plus many other chronic disease conditions.
B
Our farmer-managed seed systems in Africa are being criminalized and displaced by a very aggressive green revolution project of corporate occupation by big multinational companies. This violent agrarian transformation is facing profound objection. African farmer organizations are outraged because decisions have been made and imposed on us in a very patronizing, patriarchal way, as if the agrarian vision and solution has been designed for us.
The Gates Foundation is funding the green revolution, along with the many governments linked to the old hub of capitalism, including your government [the US], the UK and the Netherlands. It is working in very close partnership with around 80 African seed companies. The Gates Foundation is the kingpin in charge of coordinating the various green revolution initiatives taking place in Africa.
The green revolution projects are a very expensive technological package for farmers to buy into. Tens of millions of small-scale, resource-poor farmers cannot afford the high costs of inputs unless they’re subsidized by our governments or your taxpayer money. This money goes into the public purse and out to agribusiness such as Monsanto and Pioneer Hi-Bred for hybrid or improved seed and agrochemicals.
Investment has become a euphemism for land grabs, disposition and dislocation of our communities. We’ve already seen the beginnings of corporate control and concentration of our seed sector. Monsanto and Pioneer Hi Bred, both U.S. multinational companies, control most of the hybrid maize market in southern Africa. Through the acquisition of South Africa’s maize company, Panaar Seed, by Pioneer HiBred, hybrid pioneer [seeds] will make a lot of incursions [elsewhere] into Africa.
We see and fear a great deal of social dislocation, of collapse of our farming systems — and it’s already happened. In industrialized-agriculture countries like South Africa, farmers have become completely deskilled and divorced from production decisions, which are made in laboratories or in far-away board rooms.
In Uganda and other east African countries where the banana is a staple food, the Gates Foundation has invested millions of dollars into a genetically engineered banana project. Their idea is to enable Ugandans and other east Africans to access vitamin A by commercially growing a banana genetically engineered to produce beta carotene, which the body converts into vitamin A, as if a diverse diet won’t give Africans this vitamin.
Ugandans grow around 27 varieties or more of bananas. So this super banana project is a Trojan horse; it’s very similar to the golden rice they’ve been trying to commercialize since the mid-80s, which has gone nowhere after a huge expenditure of money. They’ve even started the process of feeding trials of the GM banana to US citizens at Iowa State University. It’s a way to capture the commercial markets and pry open countries that are closed to GMOs, like Uganda.
The likes of Gates revile peasant farming systems as backward and responsible for poverty and starvation in Africa. It’s as if there’s a concerted effort to make these systems obsolete, to do away with them. They’re ugly, they have to go, and they have to go now. But 80 percent of our population live in rural areas and about 70 percent of income is generated from agriculture, so what is going to happen when they empty out our rural areas? Where are all these people going to go?
I want you to reimagine Africa as a vibrant continent where farmers are in control of their seed systems, are proud of their knowledge systems, share seeds from generation to generation through the age-old practice of exchange where they are self-reliant on a huge diversity of seeds under their control, where women play an important role in production decisions, seed selection, and breeding — and where our local food economies find their roots.
Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, London 7/7 bombings, Madrid train bombings, Osama bin Laden Capture/Death, 2011 Norway Attacks, Charlie Hebdo, Boston bombing, Sandy Hook, JFK, RFK, MLK, Pearl Harbor, Lusitania, USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Aurora, CO shooting, Charleston church shooting, Tucson, AZ shooting, Port Arthur, AUS, all very real illusions.
The purpose of this article is to break down false-flag events into their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally when one thinks or speaks of a false-flag event they are referring to the Main Event. This presentation is about the entire operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.
Note: What follows is but a brief or summary of a much larger project. I am posting this to the community at large to inspire others to turn this into a full-fledged project which could include a website, presentation(video), and book. Further details can be found at the end of this article.
What exactly is a false-flag, why is it called false-flag? The term false-flag is a naval term from the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a country other than the one to which the ship belonged. This was done for multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false-flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport to use false-flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under one. To the point that it was never done. But that was a different age…
The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military origin of its name, goes as follows. Country A’s King wants to conquer and loot Country B’s land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally involved… anger, hatred, revenge. Now the skilled orator and manipulator might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an army if one’s country has been attacked, hence you are acting in defense. And this is where the false-flag comes in. Country A’s King and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself, claiming that the attackers were from Country B. The attack needs to be big enough to create real panic and fear, and for maximum effect there needs to be real deaths. The attackers need to be convincing in their role as soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match appropriately. The likelihood of success of the attack is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use mercenaries. Regardless, a successful attack will incense the populace against the ‘evil’ Country B and, therefore, justify an invasion.
The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag. However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not its specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a fabrication. One defining characteristic is that the real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or director/producer of the ‘production’ is unknown. The audience’s attention is locked on the stage; the villain, clearly identified through the official narrative, is known. But who are behind the curtains? When a staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real perpetrators, not the actors on the stage. Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?
The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. From the example above, the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the population’s reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.
As explained in the previous section, the classic false-flag was used to justify an invasion of another country. But there are numerous motivations for using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution. If the change that the leader(s) want is not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change. So the false-flag is a tool of manipulation(deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on the world stage. While the audience, the 99.9% of the world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by these ‘engineers’ from the moment of their birth until the time of their passing. They (we) are actually unknowing-unwilling participants in the machinations of the .1%.
Read entire article: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/anatomy-of-false-flag-events.html?
By Ron Paul
The credibility of all American politicians now requires acknowledging that America is engaged in a great war for survival – “the war against Islam.” Fear of “radical Islamic terrorists” requires our undivided attention. We’re to believe that the ugly and vicious violence of a very small percentage of the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world, without an army, navy, or air force, is on the verge of engulfing America and Western civilization. The claim is that the Western concept of Christianity, liberty, and free markets is threatened. If this is so, it speaks more about the weak support for these values than for the strength of a small group claiming to speak for all of Islam. It may not make much sense, but it provokes the fear required for war-mongering.
The popular belief that a gigantic clash of civilizations explains today’s conditions fits well into the propaganda efforts of the neocon inspired American Empire. One cannot deny that a group exists that associates itself with Islam and preaches violence in combination with extreme religious beliefs. Al Qaeda and ISIS do exist. Claiming that they alone are responsible for the great “clash” is purposely misleading. That misunderstanding is required by Western propagandists to gain public support for their wars in the Middle East, and for a continuation of the American Empire. Unfortunately, so far it has worked pretty well.
Fear is the tool used to galvanize a people into supporting war while sacrificing liberty. Exaggerations and propping up groups who falsely claim to represent 99 percent of Muslims, serves the interests of those in the West who want the clash of civilizations for their own selfish purposes. Current US and Western support for ISIS in Syria, even though it’s denied, is designed to remove Assad. This policy is in the tradition of our foreign policy of recent decades. Aligning ourselves with the creation of Hamas and the mujahedin (Taliban) is well documented.
The emphasis on a clash of civilizations is more about ruthless pragmatism than it is of a great battle of two civilizations. Promoters of war must first find or create an enemy to demonize in order to gain the people’s support for stupid and illegal preemptive wars. The Iraq war was built on lies and fear-mongering. US leaders, prodded by the neoconservatives, continue to propagandize for a “crusade” against Islam in order to justify rearranging the Middle East according to their desires. Disregarding all previous failures in this effort is not a problem if the people can be convinced that the enemy is grotesque and threatening our way of life.
It’s strange, but 130 people killed in Paris has served the purpose of throwing reason to the wind, and the majority of Americans have become anxious for a showdown with Islam no matter how many lies have to be told and people killed.
Read entire article: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/ron-paul/clash-civilizations/
According to Amber Lyon, a three-time Emmy award winning journalist, CNN is routinely paid by the US government and foreign governments to selectively report on certain events. Furthermore, the Obama administration pay CNN for editorial control over some of their content.
Back in March 2011, CNN sent a four person team to Bahrain to cover the Arab Spring. Once there, the crew was the subject of extreme intimidation amongst other things, but they were able to record some fantastic footage. As Glenn Greenwald of the UK’s Guardian writes in his blockbuster article from September 4th 2012:
“In the segment, Lyon interviewed activists as they explicitly described their torture at the hands of government forces, while family members recounted their relatives’ abrupt disappearances. She spoke with government officials justifying the imprisonment of activists. And the segment featured harrowing video footage of regime forces shooting unarmed demonstrators, along with the mass arrests of peaceful protesters. In sum, the early 2011 CNN segment on Bahrain presented one of the starkest reports to date of the brutal repression embraced by the US-backed regime.
Despite these accolades, and despite the dangers their own journalists and their sources endured to produce it, CNN International (CNNi) never broadcast the documentary. Even in the face of numerous inquiries and complaints from their own employees inside CNN, it continued to refuse to broadcast the program or even provide any explanation for the decision. To date, this documentary has never aired on CNNi.
Having just returned from Bahrain, Lyon says she “saw first-hand that these regime claims were lies, and I couldn’t believe CNN was making me put what I knew to be government lies into my reporting.”
Here is a segment of the Bahrain report that Amber Lyon and her team put together. CNNi refused to allow it to air because the Bahrain Government had paid them not to show it.
When Amber Lyon recognized the extent of the reasoning, she challenged CNN. CNN told her to be quiet, and began to view her as a risk. She knew, and found out, too much.
Amber is now trying to tell the story, the real story, of what is going on behind the closed doors of US Media entities. Amber has created her own website, and additionally as noted in the Guardian Article she is trying to share the truth of the deceptions.
What Amber Lyon describes is exactly the reason why CNN never aired the Nick Robertson interview with Muhammed Al Zawahiri in Egypt.
If you’re aware that only a handful of corporations (6, to be exact) control over 90% of the media, you’re one of the few. What this means is that everything you hear on the radio, read in the news, and see on television (including the ‘news’), is controlled by one of these six corporations: General Electric (GE), News Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS.
This startling truth has become more commonly accepted in recent years, especially since Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based initiative to control mainstream media, was exposed.
Popular avenues of information are now bombarded with clever marketing tactics telling the public what to think and what to buy, how to look, and where to spend hard-earned dollars. Such is evident once you wake up and note the blatant lies continuing to spam the TV screen and newspaper headlines – especially concerning the topics of health, food, war (“terrorism”), poverty, and more.
Sadly, people aren’t even aware of how brainwashed they’ve become. That’s where Sharyl Attkisson comes in.
For her eye-opening TEDx talk (below), the veteran investigative journalist (and former CBS News investigative reporter) reveals how “astroturf,” or fake grassroots movements, funded by political, corporate, or other special interests very effectively manipulate and distort media messages.
It’s time the populace wake up and question everything with integrity.
By Matt Agorist
Hollywood actor, Donald Sutherland, just dropped a bombshell on the military industrial complex. Sutherland, who plays President Coriolanus Snow in the blockbuster movie series Hunger Games, was recently asked what the movie was really about – he held no punches in his answer.
If there’s any question as to what it’s an allegory for I will tell you. It is the powers that be in the United States of America. It’s profiteers.
War is for profit. It’s not “to save the world for democracy” or “for king and country.”
No, bulls**t.
It’s for the profit of the top 10%, and the young people who see this film must recognize that for the future ‘blind faith in their leaders,’ as Bruce Springsteen said, “will get you dead.”
Those who are awake to the war machine, and have watched the movies or read the books, have undoubtedly seen the underlying anti-establishment theme within. However, those who do not notice it should heed Sutherland’s words.
It is no question that war is for the profit of very few people. In fact, as the famous, two-time Medal of Honor recipient, Major General Smedley Butler of the USMC said,
WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.
How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
Sutherland does get one thing wrong, however, and that is the percentage that he assigns to those who profit from war. It is nowhere near 10% as he states. Those who profit from war, as Smedley Butler points out above, are a tiny group of people. The ruling elite.
It’s the weapons manufacturers, the arms dealers, the inside politicians, and the State itself. Everyone else involved in war, including those who die for it, are merely pawns. They are cogs in the machine whose only purpose is to spread death and destruction.
Please share this article and video so that others, who may have missed the point of this movie series, may see its true purpose – calling out the elite for the criminals that they are.
Playing the part of the benevolent nonprofit, Planned Parenthood seems to get a kick of out pretending as though it exists to help women stay healthy and make the best reproductive decisions for their lives. However, a closer look into the group’s financials reveals that it’s a nearly $1 billion-a-year business that profits immensely from murdering the unborn babies of women.
According to data compiled by the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), more than half of Planned Parenthood’s annual revenues come from abortion services. The group rakes in $164 million annually from this segment of its business, not to mention the funds it receives from general clinic income, private donations and taxpayer disbursements.
When you add it all up, Planned Parenthood brings in almost $1 billion a year for suctioning innocent babies out of their mothers’ wombs, murdering them, and selling the remains to biotech companies for “research” purposes.
“[D]o not be deterred by Planned Parenthood protestations of concern for women: abortion is a big, dirty, money-making business,” writes Tami Jackson for Barbwire.
“The giant cash cow in the abortion business, Planned Parenthood grosses (as of 2012 stats) about $320 million per year, 51% ($164,154,000.00) from abortion services. To top that off, taxpayers wittingly or not, contribute another $542 million to the coffers as of 2012.”
Abortion, not mammograms or “women’s health”, is why Planned Parenthoood exists
You’ve probably heard the claims that Planned Parenthood’s abortion services represent just a small portion of its overall business. Three percent is what many media outlets are reporting with regards to where abortion falls under Planned Parenthood’s distribution of “reproductive health” services.
However, this number is highly misleading as abortion is the bread and butter of Planned Parenthood’s entire existence. The organization wasn’t started to provide mammograms, contrary to White House claims — Planned Parenthood doesn’t even offer breast cancer screenings — nor was it launched with the intent of helping women through pregnancy.
“The abortion industry, led by Planned Parenthood, is about committing abortion,” explains the ACLJ. “Sure they provide some other services, but when your only self-sustaining revenue source is one thing and you are responsible for 40 percent of that one thing in the entire nation, that is what you are about. Planned Parenthood is about abortion.”
If it weren’t for government funding from taxpayers, Planned Parenthood would likely be run out of business
The truth is that Planned Parenthood probably wouldn’t even exist if it weren’t for government subsidies. Government funding, which comes directly from taxpayers, accounts for nearly half of Planned Parenthood’s annual revenues. A sizable percentage of this amount comes as a result of “free” birth control initiatives at the federal level.
“Over 46 percent of its $1 billion total annual revenue comes from the government — from our tax dollars,” explains ACLJ. “According to Planned Parenthood, of this taxpayer funding, about $70 million comes through the federal government’s Title X funding — providing free birth control (including to minors).
Low-income and minority communities are where Planned Parenthood seems to thrive most. It’s within these segments of society where folks most utilize government birth control services, which end up sending large amounts of cash straight into the coffers of Planned Parenthood.
“If any other non-profit that received hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars were caught doing half the things that Planned Parenthood is caught doing they would be run out of business,” says the ACLJ, drawing attention to the Center for Medical Progress’s (CMP) undercover video series and other evidence showing criminal activity at Planned Parenthood.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051094_abortion_Planned_Parenthood_criminal_nonprofits.html#ixzz3taAycGHi
An undercover, three-year investigation led by The Center for Medical Progress has unveiled a sinister agenda hiding within Planned Parenthood. The investigation has recorded more than one Planned Parenthood top level executive arranging for the illegal trafficking of aborted fetal body parts.
Brutally intrusive Planned Parenthood surgeons are instructed to meticulously preserve some fetus body parts, while crushing others. These organs are then donated to biotech companies for research for things like flavor enhancers for food and beverages. The Planned Parenthood executives were caught on video discussing the amount of money they would like in return for each body part they sold.
This investigation shows that Planned Parenthood executives have an incentive to influence the decision-making process of women. If women were given an honest choice, would they really elect to have a surgeon selectively take fetal body parts from their womb and then preserve them and sell them to companies like Pepsi Cola for flavor research?
Pressuring women to give up fetal body parts for flavor science research
In fact, many of these healthy fetal body parts are selectively cut out and donated to Senomyx, a biotech company that focuses “on the discovery and development of savory, sweet and salt flavor ingredients that are intended to allow for the reduction of MSG, sugar and salt in food and beverage products.”
Senomyx contracts with Pepsi Cola so the popular drink manufacturer can test their additives on fetal body parts. Pepsi’s favorite body part to work with is human embryonic kidney cells.
The Senomyx website says that by “using isolated human taste receptors, we created proprietary taste receptor-based assay systems that provide a biochemical or electronic readout when a flavor ingredient interacts with the receptor.”
In other words, there is a powerful industry preying on pregnant women. Women who come to Planned Parenthood facilities are often seeking support, understanding, and unbiased counseling so they can do what’s best for their body. Instead, they are being used and abused by an industry that exploits their womb and the life inside them, all for corporate profits.
On a grand scale, Planned Parenthood is hardly supporting women physically and emotionally. Pressured to sell organs, Planned Parenthood is driving women to make hasty decisions that can stay with them for the long haul. Planned Parenthood is basically masquerading as being pro-woman and pro-choice, but it’s all a fake front, abusing women and using human life for gain.
How Komen for the Cure ties into the charade
In much the same way, Komen for the Cure (the pink ribbon charade) is out to exploit human bodies for corporate profit. This cancer attention enterprise only exists because they take $4.75 million in revenue from taxpayers each year. Significant money and resources are wasted promoting cancer with ribbons, shirts, and merchandise instead of getting to the causes. The organization doesn’t get down to the nuts and bolts of what cancer is, why it exists, what are the contributing factors, etc. If the company was honest, they would educate women on the abortion – breast cancer link.
Instead, a large portion of their money is suspiciously used to fund Planned Parenthood, of all places! Of course, the money is funneled under the guise of “cancer research,” even though Planned Parenthood does nothing to prevent cancer.
When pregnant women seek help from Planned Parenthood facilities, they are literally being bombarded and pressured from two sides. One side pressures the sale of fetal body parts for flavor science “research.” The other side uses Komen for the Cure to forcefully take money from taxpayers and deceptively funnel the funds through “cancer research” to ultimately encourage life terminating surgeries that only benefit the biotech industry. It’s a web of deceit!
And Planned Parenthood’s crony business operations don’t stop there. In 2013, they applied for more than $500 million in grants to fund their enterprise deceitfully on the backs of taxpayers.
At the end of the year, the biotech industry is satisfied with all their new research tools (fetal body parts that they bought from their middle man, Planned Parenthood). Coercion is at the root of it all and the trail of money tells a corrupt tale. If Komen for the Cure was honest, they wouldn’t be funneling money to Planned Parenthood and calling it cancer research.
Komen and Planned Parenthood should work together to educate women on the abortion – breast cancer link instead of exploiting women and human life to biotech industry profits. It’s time for the two organizations to stop pretending to be about women’s health and women’s choices. Human life is precious; it shouldn’t be used for corporate profits.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050812_Planned_Parenthood_Komen_for_the_cure_abortion.html#ixzz3ta6fGUNC
