Biosludge: a toxic cocktail of everything people flush down the toilet and part of a global depopulation PLOT against humanity.

This all-new documentary uncovers the astonishing science fraud being carried out to legalize the mass pollution of the world’s farm lands, school playgrounds and city parks with heavily contaminated industrial waste and human sewage.

As you’re probably well aware, there’s nothing stopping anyone from flushing whatever they wish down the toilet. And you may also be aware of the fact that existing filtration and treatment methods aren’t capable of removing everything harmful from the end product, which means all sorts of things are being spread as “fertilizer” on the food you and your family eat every single day.

So what’s to stop a potential terrorist from flushing biological weapons down the toilet, knowing that contaminated biosludge will eventually end up in the conventional food supply? The answer is nothing – this being another problematic element to the biosludge situation.

Watch this video now and share with everyone you know. https://www.brighteon.com/5972782789001

By Elias Marat

Facebook has found itself in the grips of yet another scandal brewing around the globe, this time involving extremely personal information. It was revealed last week that the social media giant has been collecting vast amounts of personal data through about 11 popular health and fitness apps, without people’s knowledge.

The latest issue, which casts a grim light on Facebook’s respect for users’ consent and personal data, comes on the heels of a number of scandals over the past year – ranging from the furor over last year’s Cambridge Analytica data harvesting operation to a recent report by TechCrunch revealing that the company secretly paid users, including minors as young as 13, to install an app that would siphon network and web data from phones in direct violation of Apple’s developer terms.

The Wall Street Journal‘s new report reveals that Facebook has used several apps to collect deeply sensitive user data that goes far beyond phone habits or web history, and includes users’ weight, blood pressure, and even ovulation status. After testing 70 apps, WSJ found 11 apps that have been leaking data to Facebook, even in cases when the user is logged out of the social media platform or doesn’t have an account at all.

The fitness and health apps, which were equipped with Facebook-provided developer software, were primarily meant to determine ad placement. Apps included the highly popular period-tracking app Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker – which claims to have 25 million active users – which informed Facebook when users were menstruating or if users indicated that they were attempting to become pregnant.

The Journal’s testing also revealed that Instant Heart Rate: HR Monitor sent heart rate data to the company while home sales and rental search app Realtor informed Facebook of the listings viewed by users as well as the prices of homes and those marked as “favorites.”

Facebook is able to collect the data due to the built-in features of its Software Development Kit (SDK), the open source software tools that allow developers to create apps that integrate with the social platform for the purpose of ad targeting based on user data.

Read entire article: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/02/popular-apps-are-giving-your-ovulation-and-health-data-to-facebook-without-permission.html?

By Catherine Frompovich

Shouldn’t questions like those below be asked of responsible employees in the federal government, and Congress in particular, as to why unproven-safe-5G-launches are not being stopped when 5G and weaponized microwave millimeter waves arbitrarily are about to be beamed down upon all of Planet Earth and all living organisms by individual vested-interest corporations?

Question No. 1

Is it true Wi-Fi, 4G, and 5G microwave radiation will be beamed down over the entire Planet from satellites launched into space as soon as early March 2019?

uestion No. 2

Where is the factual, independent – not “consensus microwave science” that microwave radiation in any bandwidth does NOT impact all life forces biological organisms, e.g., bees, birds, trees, and humans, including damaging DNA, breaching the blood-brain barrier, impacting the immune system, cardiopulmonary, neurologic, hormone, blood, and reproductive systems, plus may even damage chitin, a fibrous substance consisting of polysaccharides, which forms the major constituent in the exoskeleton of arthropods and the cell walls of fungi?

Question No. 3

Where are the environmental impact studies proving the military’s, microwave industry’s and the microwave telecommunications industries’ ‘claims’ of safety?  How many are there?

Question No. 4

Is it true the above industries know of 5G’s carcinogenic capabilities?

Question No. 5

Is it true 5G wireless will impact insects due to wavelength frequencies that interfere with insect biology and navigation?

Question No. 6

Is it true the company OneWeb will launch the first 6 of 900 planned satellites on Wed. Feb. 27 from French Guiana?

Question No. 7

Is Richard Branson an investor in OneWeb?  What is his investment valued at?

Question No. 8

Is it true Elon Musk’s company SpaceX plans to send thousands of satellites into orbit, beginning in June of 2019?

 Question No. 9

Have other companies been approved to send satellites into orbit? If so, who are they and when do they plan sending up satellites?

Question No. 10

What will be the cumulative human health and ecological damage effects of those 5G satellite launches on the Earth’s atmosphere and the Ozone layer, which is almost torn to shreds now?

Question No. 11

How much aluminum is thrust into the Earth’s atmosphere during each satellite launch?

What will be the atmospheric cumulative payload from all those satellite launches?Aluminum is being implicated in neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.

Question No. 12

By Patrick Wood

In 1932, Aldous Huxley foresaw a Scientific Dictatorship in his book, Brave New World. In 2019, Huxley’s dystopian future is appearing right before our eyes, but few recognize it. ⁃ TN Editor

People who have a modern smartphone normally think of 5G as nothing more than a progression from 3G and 4G. Offering fewer dropped calls, faster data transfer, and more convenience. 5G is the fifth generation of wireless technology.

This thinking barely scratches the surface. There must be a greater reason why CEOs of major cellular carriers are breaking their necks to railroad the fastest implementation in history of a new communication standard.

This reason has little to do with your personal cellphone and everything to do with the so-called Internet of Things (IoT) where all electronic devices will be connected together in real-time. Collectively, the IoT is the core technology used to implement Smart City makeovers.

“Real time” is a magical tech term. 5G is at least one order of magnitude faster than anything before it. It is comparable to everything being connected directly by fiber-optic cable where as soon as you touch the send key, your data transmission is received at the other end, faster than a blink of your eye.

Let’s do some math. 4G can transfer data at 100,000,000 bits per second (which is 10 megabits per second). That’s really fast! However, 5G blows out the same data at 10,000,000,000 bits per second, or 10 Gbps (Gigabits per second). This is 100 times faster than 4G. Secondly, 4G has a typical “ping” factor between 10ms and 50ms (milliseconds) that measures the time needed in order to send a single packet of information. 5G drops that time to 1ms.

In spite of the cutthroat American race between wireless providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, China has declared that it intends to emerge as the global leader on 5G rollout to its own 1.4 billion citizens. China is also mass-producing the technology to sell to the rest of the world.

Learn more: https://www.activistpost.com/2019/02/total-data-domination-5g-iot-ai-surveillance-and-the-smart-city.html?

Originally published on www.takebackyourpower.net

Last week, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives, who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology. Meanwhile, dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life.

Blumenthal blasted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use—for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry.

Read more here or watch the video: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-show-5g-safe?

By B.N. Frank

Last May, Waking Times published a great article by Dr. Mercola about how artificial sweeteners make people fat and sick. The title of the article was appropriately: “Reconfirmed: Artificial Sweeteners Make You Fat and Sick.”

New research was released that once again confirms the sick part. From CNN:

Drinking two or more diet beverages a day linked to high risk of stroke, heart attacks

(CNN)More bad news for diet soda lovers: Drinking two or more of any kind of artificially sweetened drinks a day is linked to an increased risk of clot-based strokes, heart attacks and early death in women over 50, according to a new study by the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.

The risks were highest for women with no history of heart disease or diabetes and women who were obese or African-American.

Previous research has shown a link between diet beverages and stroke, dementia, Type 2 diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome, which can lead to heart disease and diabetes.

Learn more here: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/02/another-study-confirms-diet-drinks-could-increase-risk-for-heart-attack-and-stroke-warns-american-heart-and-stroke-associations.html

By Jon Queally

A new peer-reviewed study shows that eating a completely organic diet—even for just one week—can dramatically reduce the presence of pesticide levels in people, a finding that was characterized as “groundbreaking” by critics of an industrial food system that relies heavily on synthetic toxins and chemicals to grow crops and raise livestock.

Published in the Environmental Research, the study—titled Organic Diet Intervention Significantly Reduces Urinary Pesticide Levels in U.S. Children and Adults (pdf)—found that switching to an organic diet significantly reduced the levels of synthetic pesticides found in all participants.

“This study shows that organic works,” said study co-author Kendra Klein, PhD, senior staff scientist at Friends of the Earth. “We all have the right to food that is free of toxic pesticides. Farmers and farm-workers growing our nation’s food and the rural communities they live in have a right not to be exposed to chemicals linked to cancer, autism and infertility. And the way we grow food should protect, not harm, our environment. We urgently need our elected leaders to support our farmers in making healthy organic food available for all.”

The study tested the urine of four diverse American families in Oakland, Minneapolis, Atlanta, and Baltimore after eating their typical diet of conventional food for six days and then after a controlled diet of all organic food for six days.

Featuring the families that participated and the scientist who carried it out, watch a video here produced by FOE Action about the study:https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/02/pesticide-levels-in-families-dropped-by-60-after-one-week-organic-diet-study.html

By: Tracey Watson

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently included vaccine skeptics – people who are hesitant to vaccinate themselves or their children because they are concerned about the potential health risks – on their annual list of “global health threats,” along with serious dangers like superbugs, climate change, the Ebola virus, HIV and air pollution. The WHO claims that “vaccine hesitancy” increases the risk of a resurgence in diseases they claim are fully preventable through vaccination.

The WHO is by no means alone in its position. Many governments, medical professionals and members of the mainstream media have attacked anti-vaxxers – as they are known – claiming that they are selfish people who put the health of the greater majority at risk. These pro-vaccine groups and individuals like to infer that to question vaccines is both unscientific and dangerous.

Learn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-02-13-doctors-admit-vaccines-are-harmful-immune-systems.html

Also see: The truth is coming out: 30% of parents realize flu shots spread the flu… vaccine industry in total panic to censor all real science about vaccines https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-02-13-parents-realize-flu-shots-spread-the-flu-vaccine.html

By MassPrivateI

According to a recently published white paper there is a worldwide effort to restrict the right to travel of everyone. And you will not believe how the U.N. is involved.

A recent article at PapersPlease.org warns that the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) wants to check every airline passenger’s background and send airlines an “Authority to Carry” before a passenger is allowed to board a plane.

Learn more: https://www.activistpost.com/2019/02/worldwide-effort-to-restrict-everyones-right-to-travel-is-close-to-a-reality.html

By: Lori Alton

(NaturalHealth365) When cancer is diagnosed, many patients choose to treat the disease with chemotherapy. But it appears that “chemo” carries health risks not only for the patients receiving it, but for those who care for them.

In fact, studies have revealed that family members of cancer patients can be exposed to chemotherapy drugs (which are hazardous carcinogens themselves) through exposure to the patient’s body fluids.  The researchers also found contamination of ordinary household surfaces – up to 48 hours after the treatment was administered.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and  Prevention (CDC), around 650,000 cancer patients receive chemotherapy in outpatient clinics every year – creating an urgent need for precautions on the part of caregivers and family members.

Warning: Exposure to chemotherapy drugs can actually cause several dangerous outcomes

Chemotherapy uses antineoplastic drugs – such as 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) – to kill cancer cells.  However, antineoplastic drugs (also called cytotoxics) also harm normal cells.

Exposure to these toxic medications can cause nausea, vomiting, hair loss and suppression of bone marrow function.  And OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) warns that the development of secondary malignancies – in other words, cancer – is a well-documented side effect of chemotherapy treatment.

The fact is: chemotherapy drugs can be associated with grave harm – even at very low exposures.

Learn more: https://www.naturalhealth365.com/chemotherapy-drug-dangers-2872.html

Virginia’s Democratic governor, Ralph Northam, publicly endorses “infanticide” as he voices support for legislation allowing abortion to term

By JD Heyes

Earlier this month Democrats in New York State shocked the consciences of tens of millions of Americans when they passed, and Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed, legislation that, according to some experts who’ve read the measure, allows doctors to kill an unborn baby right up to term.

Worse, as NewsTarget reports, the legislation also permits non-physicians to perform abortions, thereby dramatically increasing the number of providers who could be available for the procedure.

The news site noted:

The bill, named the Reproductive Health Act, uses an overly broad “health” exception for third-term abortions which many people find repugnant. Even health professionals within the field of obstetrics say that third-term abortions are never necessary; at that point, the child should just be delivered, not murdered.

Now, another Democratic governor, Ralph Northam of Virginia, gave his tacit support Wednesday for legislation introduced in the State Assembly of his state that repeals current restrictions on when abortions can legally be performed, National Review reported. (Related: Here are the names of the human child MURDERERS in the NY Senate who passed the bill legalizing infanticide.)

“This morning on WTOP’s ‘Ask The Governor,” Virginia governor Ralph Northam defended the new abortion bill introduced by state Democrats this month, the Repeal Act, which would legalize abortion up to the point of birth,” the magazine reported.

The bill’s chief sponsor is Del. Kathy Tran (D). According to her legislation, if approved and signed into law by Northam, women would be able to receive an abortion up to, but right before, natural full-term delivery.

“The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” This implies that the result might be ending the baby’s life.

Read more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-31-virginia-democratic-governor-endorses-infanticide.html

See Also: ‘A Sad and Evil Day’: New York Legalizes Abortion Up to Baby’s Birth Day   https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2019/january/a-sad-and-evil-day-new-york-legalizes-abortion-up-to-babys-birth-day-on-anniversary-of-roe-v-wade

By Brian Shilhavy
Editor – Health Impact News

Cholesterol-lowering statin drugs are a $100 billion-a-year industry.

Lipitor was, by far, the most profitable drug in the history of mankind among all pharmaceutical products, let alone being the most profitable cholesterol drug before its patent expired at the end of 2011. Sales to date from this one particular cholesterol-lowering statin drug have exceeded $140 billion.

Lipitor benefited from the change in marketing laws in 1997 that allowed pharmaceutical companies in the U.S. to advertise their products directly to consumers. Pfizer convinced an entire generation of Americans that they needed a pill to lower their cholesterol in order to prevent heart disease, in what may go down as one of the most brilliant and unethical marketing schemes of all time.

After Lipitor’s patent expired at the end of 2011, the FDA issued its first warnings against statin drugs, which include: liver injury, memory loss, diabetes, and muscle damage, among others. Thousands of lawsuits against the maker of Lipitor followed.

As we have reported many times over the years here at Health Impact News, the cholesterol theory of heart disease is not well-supported by science at all. In fact, much of the science states that cholesterol is an important part of our health, and contrary to popular belief, those with the highest levels of cholesterol actually live longer than those with lower levels of cholesterol in their blood.

See: Big Pharma Cannot Explain Why People with Very High LDL Cholesterol Have No Cardiovascular Disease and Live Long Lives

Japanese Research Exposes Statin Scam: People with High Cholesterol Live Longer

Statin Scam: People with Higher Cholesterol Live Longer than People with Low Cholesterol

However, with such a large segment of the American population moving into their senior years, the pharmaceutical industry’s attempt to keep seniors on cholesterol-lowering statin drugs continues unabated, and the largely pharma-funded corporate media is doing their part to silence doctors and other researchers who criticize the failed cholesterol theory of heart disease.

Learn more: http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/pharma-wants-every-senior-on-statin-drugs-as-corporate-media-seeks-to-silence-doctors-exposing-the-cholesterol-myth/

By Scott C. Tips

The following is excerpts from an original article by:      Whole Foods Magazine

As most of you already know, the Codex Alimentarius Commission and its various committees spread throughout the World establish food standards and guidelines after an eight-step process of consideration and debate that are then usually adopted by the Codex member states. The Codex Nutrition Committee is just one of the many committees that develop these food standards and guidelines. It is also one of the committees with the most controversial issues.

Biofortification

Biofortification is a method of increasing certain vitamin and mineral content of basic food crops by the time-honored, conventional way of cross-breeding, and not through genetic engineering. Harvest Plus, the company behind biofortification, will for example increase the vitamin or iron content of sweet potatoes so that malnourished populations in developing nations will receive better nutrition. This is a very admirable goal, although I have argued at these meetings that perhaps it’s an unnecessary one if farmers would simply employ the proper farming techniques to prevent soil depletion and along with it the vitamin and mineral content of the foods grown in that soil.

For the last several years, the Codex Nutrition Committee has been crafting a definition for Biofortification. That definition would then be used uniformly around the World to apply to those foods conventionally fortified with higher levels of nutrients and everyone would be on the same page whenever the term “biofortified” was used. Indeed, the National Health Federation (NHF), a health-freedom organization accredited by Codex to participate in its meetings and the one whose delegation I led there, was an early supporter at Codex of this definition.

We have already gone through the sordid history, in detail, of how the draft definition of Biofortification had been infused with the disease of GMOs.1 I won’t repeat that history here. Just know that, now, the term Biofortification will have huge ramifications for the entire world. If the pro-GMO forces can succeed in continuing to hide their genetic-engineered foods within the definition of Biofortification and in using its appealing, natural-sounding name to sell their GMO foods, then consumers will be deceived on a worldwide scale.

The term “Biofortification,” at least within European countries, risks consumer confusion as to whether they are purchasing organic products or something else entirely. If Codex were to allow “any method of production” and “any source” to be part of the Biofortification definition, then Codex would be promoting marketing deception of the worst sort. Most consumers want GM foods labelled. In fact, consumer polls across the World have shown this to be true. In the United States alone, some 90% of consumers want such labeling and yet, here, the current, proposed definition will disguise GM foods under the term Biofortification. That is dishonest, disgraceful, and makes a mockery of Codex and its pretensions to credibility and transparency.

Read the entire article here: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/01/gmo-foods-will-soon-be-mislabeled-as-biofortified.html

Pills made from medicinal neem leaves and flower

By: Sayer Ji, Founder

Considering the veritable nightmare of adverse effects associated with ibuprofen use — the “pain killer” that that is ‘so effective’ it permanently cures pain by killing the patient — it behooves both the medical profession and the health consumer to find safer alternatives, even if that means going back to the time-tested, multi-culturally validated tradition of herbal medicine.

Here are a 5 clinically validated, natural alternatives worth considering:

1. Arnica: a 2007 study found that arnica, applied topically, was as effective as ibuprofen for relieving symptoms associated with osteoarthritis of the wrist, and with less side effects.

2. Ginger: a 2009 study found that ginger was effective as ibuprofen for pain symptoms associated with difficult menstrual cycles (dysmenorrhea).

3. Turmeric: a 2014 study found that turmeric extracts were as effective as ibuprofen for relieving symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.

4. Thyme: 2004 study found that an extract of thyme was as effective as ibuprofen in reducing pain and spasm symptoms associated with difficult menstrual cycles (dysmenorrhea).

5. Omega-3 fatty acids: a 2006 study found that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation with fish oil helped neurosurgery patients reduce their need for medications, and experienced results consistent with previous research indicating palliative effects at least as effective as ibuprofen.

6. Cinnamon: a 2015 study found that cinnamon was as effective as ibuprofen for pain associated with difficult menstrual cycles (dysmenorrhea).

   http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/6-natural-ibuprofen-alternatives-backed-clinical-research?

By Mac Slavo

By MILLIONS AGAINST MONSANTO

Ever wonder how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could continue to support the use of glyphosate—even after 17 of the world’s best scientists at the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that the key active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller is a “probable human carcinogen”?

A new study published this week in Environmental Sciences Europe answers that question. As it turns out, the EPA based its conclusions on unpublished industry studies—99 percent of which found that glyphosate doesn’t damage your DNA.

The scientists at WHO’s International Agency on Cancer Research (IARC), on the other hand, relied on non-industry, published, peer-reviewed studies—and 74 percent of those found that glyphosate does damage DNA.

Gee, wonder how that happened? Could Monsanto lobbyists have had something to do with which studies the EPA used, and which ones it ignored?

Reporting on the new study, the writers at GM Watch said:

The article shows that only by framing and constraining its genotoxicity assessment in a highly selective and biased way was the EPA able to conclude that glyphosate was not genotoxic. It also demonstrates that the EPA’s cancer classification – as well as EFSA’s, which was based on the same data and was reached in a similar way – is scientifically baseless. Overall, the article shows that the way pesticides are assessed for risk is not fit for purpose and exposes people and the environment to unacceptable risks.

Read ‘How did the U.S. EPA and IARC reach opposite conclusions about glyphosate’s genotoxicity?’

By Vicki Batts

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been the stuff of sci-fi nightmares for decades, but under the reign of Big Tech, those nightmares may soon become reality. As AI technology becomes more advanced, the threat of total robotic takeover becomes more pronounced — and the tech industry is perfectly poised to capitalize on the power of AI. Censorship by way of algorithm should be presenting a major moral dilemma to Big Tech right now, but instead, these left-wing zealots are racing towards stronger, more far-reaching suppression tactics. This is bad news for anyone who believes in freedom.

The right to think and express your thoughts is supposed to be protected under the First Amendment. The rise of social media has drastically changed the ways in which people communicate across the board, but the lengths to which we preserve our right to free speech has not kept pace. Continuing to allow the tech industry to play thought police is a threat to the most important freedom we have: The freedom to think independently. While proponents of censorship are quick to assure the masses that their actions are intended for good, the truth of the matter is that AI can easily be corrupted and used for flat-out thought suppression.

Learn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-15-big-tech-censorship-leading-toward-takeover-of-humanity.html

By Isabelle Z. for Natural News

In many ways, it’s a good time to be a human. We have no shortage of modern comforts, and many of the threats that killed our predecessors are no longer an issue. However, at the same time, we are also facing new dangers brought about by all the advances in modern technology and medicine. Here’s how you can protect yourself against two of the biggest ones: smart meters and vaccines.

We’ll start by addressing smart meters as this is one danger that a lot of people don’t think twice about. These digital meters, which are being installed in homes around the world, are quietly exposing people to radiation that causes cancer while also recording personal data and transmitting it wirelessly. They’re a threat not only to your health but also your privacy. They can raise your risk of problems like cancer, migraines, insomnia, Parkinson’s, ADD, and oxidative damage, yet people allow power companies to install them in their homes because they believe they don’t have a choice.

It’s a similar story when it comes to vaccines, although more people are aware of those dangers. Their link to autism is well-known, and millions of people have sustained vaccine injuries; some have even died from vaccines. Children are especially vulnerable as their bodies are still developing. Many parents know this, but they feel pressured into complying.

Use the law to your advantage

What can you do if you don’t want to subject yourself or your family to these dangers? The answer is related to the opt-out contract that utility companies and doctors try to get you to sign when you refuse to poison yourself with their smart meters and vaccines. It’s an intimidation tactic more than anything. After all, refusing to get the meter or vaccine in the first place means you’ve already opted out.

According to personal rights crusader Jerry Day, these contracts are sneaky ways of getting people to say they should have opted in and to agree to give up some rights or pay penalties. Opt-out contracts don’t help you; they give the power to the other party.

Day says you should never sign them. Instead, keep in mind that you have what is known as “right of contract.” This means that your signature on any contract cannot be coerced or pressured in any way. If your utility company or doctor is making you feel pressured to sign it, it has no legal standing as long as you can prove there was coercion. You can’t be penalized in any way for refusing to sign something.

What if you signed an opt-out like this recently and you’re now having second thoughts? According to the law, you can send in a written revocation of a contract within three days for any – or no – reason; you have three days to change your mind by law on everything from cell phone contracts to mortgages and yes, opt-outs.

If your power company threatens to cut off your electricity for not signing or your doctor threatens to withhold services or have your child banned from school if you don’t comply, Day suggests you counter with a proposal of your own. If what they are offering you involves a risk to you of any kind, they have to insure you against that risk, so he suggests you ask them to sign a conditional acceptance. Tell them they must sign it before you agree to whatever it is they are proposing. Any time there is a risk, you have the right to refuse an offer unless they agree to insure you against the risks posed.

This means that when you’re being asked to sign anything related to one of these dangerous interventions, simply ask the person in question to agree to insure you against the risks and present them with a conditional acceptance contract. In other words, you’re saying that they must promise to be held accountable for any negative consequences before you accept. Of course, they probably won’t agree, so then you have the right to simply refuse and move on. Don’t let anyone bully you into getting a dangerous vaccine or smart meter.                                                                                                   https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-15-actions-to-take-to-protect-yourself-from-vaccines-smart-meters.html

By Isabelle Z. for Natural News

How much Roundup have you consumed this week? This question might sound like a joke, but the amount of the toxic weed killer that people consume unwittingly is certainly no laughing matter.

Most people have no idea just how widely used this chemical is. Now that Monsanto has genetically engineered crops to stand up to heavy doses of the chemical, it’s being sprayed on more food crops than ever. It is then taken up into the plants that we eat – as do the farm animals that we often end up eating as well.

According to a study by Norwegian scientists, American soy crops contain excessive glyphosate levels inside the food crop. In fact, the levels they found were “extreme” even by Monsanto’s own standards, which they defined as 5.6 milligrams for each kilogram of plant weight; the levels found in the study were 9 milligrams per kilo on average.

This might be enough to send you scrambling in the opposite direction of tofu, but even if you don’t happen to eat it, you’re not out of the woods. That’s because GE soy and corn – two  more crops that are often engineered to be Roundup-ready – are in the ingredients lists of many processed foods, hiding under terms like lecithin, mono-diglyceride, textured vegetable protein, and soya, to name a few.

In fact, a report from the Environmental Working Group found that 26 out of the 28 common breakfast foods they tested contained higher levels of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, than they consider safe for children. The foods involved will be all too familiar to most American households, including cereals, oat products, and snack bars from popular brands like Cheerios and Quaker.

Learn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-16-science-pouring-in-probably-eating-roundup-herbicide.html

By Organic Consumers Association

In November 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa) (the equivalent of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration) approved the use of glyphosate for another five years, despite calls for the herbicide to be banned. In December 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a risk assessment statement declaring that glyphosate is “not likely” to cause cancer.

Both the EPA and Efsa contradicted the findings of the World Health Organization (WHO), which in March 2015, classified glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen.” Instead of taking WHO scientists’ word for it, Efsa re-approved glyphosate based on a safety assessment conducted by Germany’s Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).

Now, the Guardian reports that BfR plagiarized chemical industry reports throughout that assessment—the one used by the EU’s food safety agency to determine glyphosate’s safety. According to the Guardian, the assessment contained “copy-and-pasted tracts from Monsanto studies.”

And a new study in published in Environmental Sciences Europe says the EPA assessed the safety of glyphosate largely on the basis of industry studies, not independent peer-reviewed articles.

No wonder government agencies fail over and over to protect us from chemicals that shouldn’t be used at all, much less sprayed on our food.

And no wonder we have to use our own precious financial and human resources to keep educating the public about this Big Fail, and keep the pressure on corrupt corporations and their dubious influence over government agencies.

The U.S. EPA is supposed to rule on the safety of chemicals like glyphosate once every 15 years. For glyphosate, the deadline for that decision was December 2015. Yet here we are, more than three years later, with no decision.

While the EPA twiddles its thumbs—and continues to base its “safety” assessments on industry studies—glyphosate continues to poison our food and waterways.

Thanks to you, we’ll keep the pressure on the EPA (which likely is stalling because it doesn’t want to deal with your wrath), and on the corporations that continue to sell and use Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller.

Organic Consumers Association